AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Debsankar Mukhopadhyay

CS116 · CS216 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Mukhopadhyay if you want a and strong student support.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringLenientHands-On LecturesQuick RepliesManageable Workload
  • Both reviews give the professor the highest quality rating and .
  • Students describe him as , and helpful.
  • The workload appears manageable, though .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Grades look very attainable because students report lenient treatment, manageable workload, and full credit for a late project.

Online evidence shows an A+ with , while and manageable work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The courses seem moderately challenging but approachable because lectures are hands-on and the workload is described as manageable.

Online evidence emphasizes guided lecture focus, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

One online review explicitly says attendance is mandatory and tied to a quiz, while the .

Only the ; in-person evidence does not clearly prove a policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Both students strongly recommend him because , and helpful beyond class.

Both formats are positive, with online praise focused on responsiveness and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

The because a late project received full credit and the student calls him lenient.

Format shift

, while online evidence shows clear criteria but less detail on leniency.

Workload

Light

82/100

The only direct workload comment says the workload was definitely manageable in a five-week course.

Format shift

, while online evidence does not describe workload volume clearly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students describe him as , and invested in student success.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes hands-on teaching and quick replies, while and flexibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The reviews mention projects and .

Format shift

, while online evidence mentions an .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The in-person review describes a lenient, understanding professor with manageable workload and flexibility on late work.

Main concern

The evidence is very limited because there is .

What students said

“the workload was definitely manageable”
CS116
“he even allowed me to submit a .”
CS116

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review describes hands-on lectures, quick email replies, strong preparation, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ it”
CS216
“He replies to emails quickly and recommendation.”
CS216

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , so .

Attendance QuizProject

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove exam format, quiz format, midterms, finals, or proctoring.

Project
“he even allowed me to submit a .”
CS116

Online

The online review mentions an but does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Attendance Quiz
“ it”
CS216

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lenient and understanding professor, I took an asynchronous 5-week course and the workload was definitely manageable, he even allowed me to submit a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“his lectures are very hands on.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“He replies to emails quickly and recommendation.”

⚖️

92/100

“he even allowed me to submit a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are very hands on.
  • He constantly brings attention to subjects we should place focus on.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • Lenient and understanding professor
  • He replies to emails quickly and recommendation.

Theme 3

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • the workload was definitely manageable
  • he even allowed me to submit a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because though both are recent, detailed, and consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CS1161 review
CS2161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values