AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Juan Gonzales

MATH · MATH115 · MATH125 · MATH110 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
7.69%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid him unless you already know the math well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingPoor explanationsTest heavySelf-teachingAvoid
  • Most students and expects students to teach themselves.
  • as harsh, with little or no partial credit and very few graded items.
  • The course is risky for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report harsh grading, no partial credit, no , and .

The online review is too limited but negative, while grading.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The math content feels much harder because reviews , and expects students to already know the material.

Both formats point to self-teaching, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and missing class leaves students without needed test information.

; the online review does not clearly address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

7/100

Students overwhelmingly advise avoiding him due , and low pass confidence.

Both the single online review and the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

4/100

Students repeatedly report no partial credit, no , strict format expectations, and correct answers marked wrong.

Format shift

The the online review also describing unfair treatment.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described as high, but grades depend heavily on a assignment-heavy.

Format shift

and , while the online review gives little workload detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most reviews say he does not teach clearly, skips steps, avoids questions, or leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching support, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

94/100

Grades , and few graded items, with little credit for .

Format shift

, while the online review does not specify assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, , and poor student support.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“He will mark your answers incorrect even if your answer is correct, seriously, and is extremely frustrating.”
MATH125
“ you don't. No partial credit.”
MATH125
“HE DOES NOT TEACH!!”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and says students must teach themselves while questions are not welcomed.

Main concern

Lack of support and blocked communication are the main risks.

What students said

“Expects you to teach yourself .”
MATH
“Don't like answering questions .”
MATH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews describe few questions, no partial credit, strict deadlines, and .

Few Exam QuestionsNo Partial CreditNo Extra CreditStrict DeadlinesExam-Heavy Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

6/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

questions, no partial credit, and no extra credit, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Few Exam QuestionsNo Partial CreditNo Extra CreditStrict DeadlinesExam-Heavy Grading
“He grades by attendance, 2 exams , and 1 final.”
MATH125
“If a ZERO.”
MATH125
“Exams are five questions worth 2 points each.”
MATH125

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, webcam rules, or Lockdown Browser use.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is an awful teacher. HE DOES NOT TEACH!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ .”

⚖️

4/100

“ you don't. No partial credit.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

7/100

“Doesn't know what he's doing and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Expects you to teach yourself .
  • .
  • he doesnt teach and just stands there leaving the problem on the board

Theme 2

📉 About Grades And Passing

  • No EC what's so ever!!
  • He will mark your answers incorrect even if your answer is correct, seriously, and is extremely frustrating.
  • If a ZERO.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • Exams are five questions worth 2 points each.
  • He grades by attendance, 2 exams , and 1 final.
  • All tests are multile choice along with 3 problems where you show your'e work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 21 reviews across many years with highly consistent complaints about teaching and grading.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH12513 reviews
MATH1154 reviews
MATH3 reviews
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

3

D 3

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1