AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Emma Lopez

MATH236 · MATH125 · STATS227 · MATH115 · E3833 · MATH110 · STATALG · MATH227 · MATH260 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle fast math pacing, heavy practice work, and occasional self-teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed teaching qualityHeavy homeworkFast-paced lecturesCaring when effectiveTough grading complaints
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, with older praise but several severe recent complaints.
  • Many students say the workload is heavy and lectures can move too quickly.
  • Successful students usually keep up with , and study guides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A good grade is possible, but students repeatedly , and keeping up with fast lectures.

The lone online review says to study and do the work, while effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Math content often feels harder because , and packed with work.

Online evidence is too limited to judge content ease, while and confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not prove a , but many say showing up, taking notes, and doing class participation are important.

In-person reviews emphasize showing up and class participation, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and supportive, but many warn against her because of rushed teaching and heavy work.

The one online review is strongly positive, but and includes severe negative warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some students report and study guides, but and few high-stakes items are recurring concerns.

Format shift

Online evidence sounds fair and supportive, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews describe lots of , and packed pacing.

Format shift

The online review advises steady study, while overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with strong praise in some terms and serious complaints about confusion, rushing, and vague help in others.

Format shift

The only online review is very positive, but and recent in-person comments trend negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Grades appear to rely on tests, quizzes, homework, worksheets, class participation, and finals.

Format shift

Both formats mention work plus tests or evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, ranging from clear and , and tough.

Main concern

Students may need to self-study when lectures feel rushed or unclear.

What students said

“be prepared to self study or watch youtube”
MATH236
“Her Lectures are really easy to understand and .”
MATH115
“ of us were putting in.”
MATH260

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is very positive and describes Lopez as caring, accommodating, and helpful.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online confidence is limited.

What students said

“She is empathetic, and very helpful.”
MATH227
“Study, do the work, create a study group with classmates.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe standard math testing through quizzes, tests, and finals, but do .

Tests based on classworkStudy guides mentionedQuizzes and final mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules or strict proctoring.

Study guides before testsFinal mentionedQuizzes mentioned
“ .”
MATH115
“She gives .”
MATH236
“I got 58/85 on my final & still passed with an 83%.”
MATH227

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove quiz format, midterm format, final format, open-book rules, webcam rules, or proctoring.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“be prepared to self study or watch youtube”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching consistency, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“she can confuse the students at times.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“the amount of work that was packed into a single week was overwelling, especially because she would go through note taking at a very fast rate.”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

48/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rushed lessons& when we sought help the responses were vague,which left us more frustrated than before.
  • Her Lectures are really easy to understand and .
  • She moves EXTREMELY fast through lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Work and Grades

  • gives A LOT of hw, most of which are filled with questions she hasn't taught.
  • Took her class this summer it was hard work!
  • of us were putting in.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She works with you one on one if you need extra help.
  • She was very accommodating to my DSP&S needs.
  • She really wants you to pass so she stays after class and also answers texts if they are math related.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews over many years provide detailed but inconsistent evidence, with recent negative reviews affecting confidence in current experience.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1155 reviews
MATH2604 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH2273 reviews
MATH2363 reviews
Show 4 more courses
E38332 reviews
MATH1101 review
STATALG1 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1