AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

H Ong

ALGEB134 · MATH125 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH260 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can keep up with fast math lectures and , and reviews.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast PaceHeavy HomeworkTest HeavyMixed ClarityStudy Guide Dependent
  • and easy, while others say they cannot understand his pace or explanations.
  • In-person classes can reward , and study test reviews, but the workload is often heavy.
  • Online reviews are strongly negative and say he reads from the book without explaining.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible when tests closely follow reviews, but , and real study demands.

The easy-A , while online reviews describe dropping or not understanding the class.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is often manageable, but the fast pace and students.

, while online reviews consistently describe the course as .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but students repeatedly say skipping makes success unlikely.

, while online reviews do not clearly establish an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendation is low because recent and negative , and lack of support.

Online reviews are clearly negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Grading can , and predictable reviews, but some students still call him tough.

Format shift

; online grading leniency is not clearly supported.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of homework and heavy studying, especially for students who struggle with the lecture pace.

Format shift

Heavy workload , while online reviews focus more on poor instruction.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

Some students find him straightforward, but many say he teaches .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades , and study guides, with as support rather than the core assessment.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details; online reviews do not clearly describe the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising predictable tests and others criticizing speed, clarity, and workload.

Main concern

The main risk is falling behind because lectures move fast and .

What students said

“His tests are 95% from the study guide, 5% from class notes.”
MATH260
“He teaches way too fast for the average person to understand.”
MATH260
“The on review day except the numbers change a bit.”
MATH260

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and students could not understand the course.

Main concern

Online students report and very low support.

What students said

“you are not going to be able to understand anything he says”
MATH245
“He will just read thru the book and ”
MATH245

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually test-heavy but often predictable because several students say tests resemble study guides, reviews, or prior tests.

Study Guide Based TestsDropped Lowest TestTest HeavyFinal From Prior Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as review-based or predictable, but .

Study Guide Based TestsDropped Lowest TestFinal From Prior Tests
“His tests are 95% from the study guide, 5% from class notes.”
MATH260
“ .”
MATH260
“ and you will definitely get A”
MATH260

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He teaches way too fast for the average person to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“He teaches way too fast for the average person to understand.”

📈 Grade Path

58/100

“This class is not hard at all If you go to every classes and do the homework.”

📝

62/100

“The on review day except the numbers change a bit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches way too fast for the average person to understand.
  • He's just not a good teacher.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Do all the homework and copy all the notes.
  • you really gave to study hard
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • His tests are 95% from the study guide, 5% from class notes.
  • The on review day except the numbers change a bit.
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

There are 26 reviews across many years with , and mixed teaching clarity.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH26011 reviews
MATH1256 reviews
MATH1154 reviews
MATH2453 reviews
1151 review
Show 1 more courses
ALGEB1341 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1