AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

R Wong

MAT245 · MATH245 · MATHS125 · ALGE8058 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math and using study guides or to survive.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Study HeavyFast PacedTough GraderTest HeavyExtra Credit
  • Students , and dismissive when they ask questions.
  • Some students still find the class passable or and .
  • Online reviews are especially negative and , and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some tests are study-guide-based and exists, but many students say .

, while online reviews describe self-teaching and low support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content can feel difficult because , and needing outside help.

Online reviews are more consistently difficult, while lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At least one online review but if students do not attend.

The strictest attendance evidence comes from online Zoom class, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most negative comments warn about unclear teaching, rude responses to questions, and heavy self-teaching.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while but include many severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and study-guide-based tests help, but and mismatched-test complaints prevent calling grading lenient.

Format shift

and easy tests more often, while online reviews include tough grading and support complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and studying on their own.

Format shift

Online and for students who need clear instruction.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many students describe unclear lectures, poor support, fast pacing, and making students feel dumb when asking questions.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly negative, while but still contains repeated severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Reviews repeatedly emphasize tests, study guides, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention test-heavy structure, but detailed .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split between very easy study-guide-based tests and and rude behavior.

Main concern

The and a classroom style that can discourage questions.

What students said

“ and often shifts from topic and .”
MATH125
“ !!!”
MATH125
“This guy is the easiest professor in the Universe.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear , and self-study.

Main concern

and having to teach themselves.

What students said

“this professor is really bad, ”
MATH227
“No support despite taking the class with support”
MATH227
“Ended up teaching myself.”
MAT245

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often central and sometimes study-guide-based, but several students say .

Study Guide Based TestsTest HeavyExtra CreditPossible Attendance Points

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, though some students say tests differ from homework.

Study Guide Based TestsTest HeavyExtra Credit
“ !!!”
MATH125
“The because the study guide was exactly the same”
ALGE8058
“ !!”
MATH125

Online

and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policy.

Test HeavyPossible Attendance Points
“ ”
MATH227
“ if you don't attend”
MAT245

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ended up teaching myself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ and often shifts from topic and .”

📈 Grade Path

55/100

“Practice, practice, practice and you will succeed.”

⚖️

48/100

“He gives everyone the chance to EARN pts”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • this professor is really bad,
  • and often shifts from topic and .
  • Ended up teaching myself.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy if .
  • Practice, practice, practice and you will succeed.
  • Do the homework.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • !!!
  • The because the study guide was exactly the same
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 reviews over many years with , and self-study.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH12511 reviews
MAT2452 reviews
MATH2272 reviews
ALGE80581 review
MATH2451 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHS1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2