AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shinichi Yabuki

MATH112 · MATH125 · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATH241 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH260 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSkips stepsHomework heavyTough graderLecture heavyConfusing explanations
  • Many students say he skips steps, uses mental math, and expects students to already understand the material.
  • Grading and as hard, though one older review reports generous .
  • A few students with strong math skills praise him, but the overall recommendation signal is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

A few students report easy grades or , but , and heavy self-study.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Math content becomes harder because he skips steps, does mental work, and assumes prior understanding.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Several tags warn that skipping class will prevent passing, and lecture dependence appears high.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most recent and detailed reviews warn against taking him because and support is limited.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Several reviews call him a tough grader, though one and .

Format shift

and is somewhat mixed but mostly strict.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews describe the class as and requiring extensive textbook rereading or review.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students repeatedly say he skips steps and his style.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and homework, with exams carrying the most risk.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in person and shows a polarizing math instructor whose explanations work for some strong students but confuse many others.

Main concern

because he skips steps and can be hard to ask for help.

What students said

“Most of the times he resolves problems in his head and skips steps on how to Solve them.”
MATH260
“Doesn't know how to teach or .”
MATH227
“very easy, if you actually study!!!!”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard and grading can be strict, but reviews do not .

Hard TestsTest HeavyTough GradingPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe hard and test-heavy classes, but .

Hard TestsTest HeavyTough Grading
“ ”
MATH241
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH227
“ the answer being correct”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doesn't know how to teach or . Be prepared to re-read your entire textbook after class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Most of the times he resolves problems in his head and skips steps on how to Solve them.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

36/100

“ ”

👍 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he skips many steps
  • Doesn't know how to teach or .
  • He shows different techniques besides what my Jr. High teachers taught me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Super easy A!!! good arrangement and generous !

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • If you're a but he skips many steps.
  • If your math skills are strong, he's probably a fine teacher.
  • Be prepared to re-read your entire textbook after class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years provide consistent evidence , and mixed teaching fit.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1256 reviews
MATH2603 reviews
MATH2272 reviews
MATH2412 reviews
MATH1051 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1101 review
MATH1121 review
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3