AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Randy Hoggan

ELECTRON120 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative, because the limited evidence reports a poor .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTries to explainUncomfortable classroomSome learningClear gradingNot recommended
  • The only review says students learn a bit and that .
  • The same review is dominated by a severe classroom-comfort complaint.
  • There is not enough evidence to judge workload, exams, or and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The student earned an A and , but the review does not prove the class is an easy A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course appears moderately difficult because the student reports learning only a bit and gives a middle difficulty rating.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The review is strongly negative because the classroom experience was uncomfortable despite some teaching effort.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and a , so leniency cannot be strongly proven.

Format shift

Only one in-person review supports this, and there is .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is unclear because the .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is poor overall because the but focuses on a very negative classroom experience.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and there is no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assessment methods are not described clearly, so the balance between assignments and exams cannot be determined.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and it gives no assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review reports some learning but a very negative classroom comfort experience.

Main concern

The main concern is an uncomfortable and distracting in-person environment.

What students said

“You learn a bit from him and .”
Electron-120
“it gave me nausia every time he was past by”
Electron-120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You learn a bit from him and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“You learn a bit from him and .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“it gave me nausia every time he was past by”

⚖️

55/100

“You learn a bit from him and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You learn a bit from him and .
  • then if you need help he would come and touch our keyboard and mouse

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • He hardly showers and stinks a bit
  • it gave me nausia every time he was past by

Theme 3

📈 About Grades And Difficulty

  • You learn a bit from him and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, it has limited academic detail, and it cannot establish stable patterns.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Electron-1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values