AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Julio HERRERA

MATH102 · MATH060 · E3859 · MATH110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can keep up with fast math instruction and do not need frequent communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-paced lecturesMixed clarityTest-heavy structureHelpful reviewsUneven communication
  • Students report mixed teaching quality, with and .
  • Grades seem achievable, but the learning experience depends heavily on keeping up with the pace.
  • The , and inconsistent review support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Passing with a solid grade seems realistic, but students must keep up with fast lectures and homework.

Online evidence is limited and grade visibility is a concern, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is not described as impossible, but fast pacing and .

The online review calls lectures clear, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation appears important, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online has a participation tag, while in-person reviews focus more on pace and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations are mixed because some students value his help, while others criticize clarity, pacing, and communication.

The online review is hesitant due to communication issues, while in-person .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Students describe him as an , and grades appear reachable without strong evidence of harshness.

Format shift

, while the online review gives little grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and teaching pace is fast.

Format shift

The online review emphasizes tests, while homework.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching is inconsistent, with and caring instruction but also complaints about speed and .

Format shift

Online evidence praises lecture clarity but communication is weak, while and pace.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews mention tests, test reviews, test solutions, and a .

Format shift

and test preparation as central assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students finding him helpful and organized while others call the and too fast.

Main concern

The pace can be fast, and slower explanations.

What students said

“ .”
MATH060
“Goes through content a little fast but truly cares about his students and wants them to pass.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review praises clear lectures and but and hidden grades.

Main concern

Students may struggle with communication and grade visibility.

What students said

“He did not respond to most of the emails people sent him”
MATH-102
“he was really good with his lectures the and easy”
MATH-102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam setup appears standard to moderately student-friendly, with helpful reviews and but limited policy detail.

Test HeavyReview Before TestTake-Home Test

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove closed-book status or proctoring.

Three In-Class TestsOne Take-Home TestTest Solutions Online
“Gives 3 in class tests and 1 take home test to help your grade.”
MATH110
“everything you .”
E3859

Online

The online review mentions tests and a but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book status, or .

Test HeavyReview Before Test
“The review before the .”
MATH-102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does go through the course a little bit fast so if your slow you might have an issue.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“he was really good with his lectures the and easy”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“ !”

⚠️ Main Risk

45/100

“He teaches too fast, gets off topic and there is .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the and easy
  • .
  • and everything you .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • it's basically easy and me not knowing math passed with a B so it wasn't as tough.
  • Received the !!
  • He does go through the course a little bit fast so if your slow you might have an issue.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • The review before the .
  • Gives 3 in class tests and 1 take home test to help your grade.
  • Rarely every reviews for tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 5 reviews, but they include useful details and a and negative patterns.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews
E38591 review
MATH-1021 review
MATH0601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values