AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susana Acosta Acuna

MATH236 · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATH150 · MATH110 · CLASS · MATH227 · MATH125 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a and are ready to work hard every week.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but demandingLots of homeworkClear lecturesTough examsFast pace
  • Many students praise her clear explanations and .
  • The class often , and serious studying.
  • A few students , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Getting an A is possible, but students , and asking for help.

Online evidence is too limited, while effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

She often makes math clearer, but statistics and as difficult and sometimes fast-paced.

but little content detail, while in-person reviews give stronger evidence of challenging math content.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is strongly recommended because lectures, notes, and hints matter, though .

Online evidence , while in-person reviews often say skipping class hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and care, but negative reviews warn about workload, pace, and .

Online recommendations are mixed from only two reviews, while but more detailed about risks.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and clear criteria help, but several students call her tests hard or .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is thin, while and tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and several reviews describe lots of assignments, quizzes, and tests.

Format shift

Both online and in-person evidence much stronger.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most students describe her as , and helpful, but a minority strongly criticize her pace and guidance.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is split, while and support despite the difficulty.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and occasional take-home work, so assessment is not purely exam-based.

Format shift

Online reviews mainly mention homework, while quizzes and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and clear teacher whose math classes still demand homework, attendance, and .

Main concern

Students who struggle with fast math lectures or .

What students said

“Her lectures were very easy to understand and follow.”
MATH125
“She lectures very heavy and goes too fast.”
MATH227
“Professor Acuna is very caring and approachable.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online feedback is split between one very negative review and one praising .

Main concern

The online sample is too small and inconsistent to judge confidently.

What students said

“ .”
MATH227
“SHE IS A GREAT PROFESSOR VERY UNDERSTANDING AND BUT IF YOU DONT UNDERSTAND!”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to standard-to-difficult tests, with but no clear proctoring policy.

Hard TestsQuizzesStudy GuidesTake-Home Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often describe difficult tests and but not enough detail to define the policy.

Hard TestsQuizzesTake-Home Exams Mentioned
“ and only gives once chance for tests & quizzes.”
MATH150
“She hands out HW and and doesn't even grade them to see what you did wrong.”
MATH125
“ but .”
125

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Acuna is great. Ill tell you I had to work my butt off for my A but what can I expect first off its college and then its math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Her lectures were very easy to understand and follow.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“You will need to dedicate a lot of time to the class, especially given the amount of .”

⚖️ Grade Effort

56/100

“I had to work my butt off for my A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and straight to the point.
  • She has the ability to clearly simplify the materials for students to easily understand.
  • She lectures very heavy and goes too fast.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an easy A, then you have to study hard!
  • and only gives once chance for tests & quizzes.
  • but .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Professor Acuna is very caring and approachable.
  • material if you have any questions.
  • and willing to help students if you ask.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 31 reviews span many years and , and hard exams.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH22716 reviews
MATH1054 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH1502 reviews
Show 4 more courses
1251 review
CLASS1 review
MATH1101 review
MATH2361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 4