AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Elisa Lee

MATH120 · MATH125 · MATH110 · MATH000 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
27.78%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle a , and learning a lot independently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy HomeworkTough GraderLecture HeavyRushed TestsMixed Teaching Quality
  • , and paper-heavy work.
  • Many , and poor explanations.
  • , help, and friendliness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but , and strict expectations.

Online reviews are harsher about grading and self-teaching, while earning A grades with heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content becomes harder because lectures are heavy, notes move quickly, and many students struggle to keep up.

Online students describe more independent learning, while but still heavy pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because reviews say skipping class can make passing unlikely and students must follow along closely.

, while in-person evidence suggests attendance matters through lectures, notes, and tests.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because of , and unclear or unsupportive teaching.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while but still dominated by workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a and .

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, with online reviews especially critical of late work and .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and difficulty managing other classes.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

, but many students say and they relied on outside resources.

Format shift

Online teaching is reviewed much more negatively, while and examples.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The course , and tests rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize homework and tests, while , and test performance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong complaints about workload and grading but some praise for and help.

Main concern

Students often mention lots of homework and .

What students said

“Too much hw. and not get behind.”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly report excessive , and reliance on YouTube.

Main concern

Online reviews say students often had to teach themselves while keeping up with .

What students said

“ if you want google and YouTube to teach you, because thats what she recommends.”
MATH120
“Gives tons of homework, if you plan on yet.”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or browser requirements, but as strict, rushed, and detail-heavy.

Test HeavyTough GradingRushed Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe strict and rushed tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Rushed TestsStrict Test Grading
“ because again, she doesn't give enough time.”
MATH120
“She and when it comes to a test she marks you up for every little detail.”
MATH120

Online

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Test HeavyTough Grading
“I don't like the .”
MATH120
“ . if its not exactly the way she wants no credit for you”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Too much hw. and not get behind. I would advise to take another professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Gives tons of homework, if you plan on yet.”

⚖️

20/100

“if its not exactly the way she wants no credit for you”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • if you don't like receiving a pile of work and .
  • Too much hw. and not get behind.
  • Looots of HW from the textbook which can be found online and wrkshts as if the .

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades And Tests

  • I .
  • because again, she doesn't give enough time.
  • , so make sure every single thing is correct or expect .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 24 reviews span many years and repeat the same workload and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH12016 reviews
MATH1103 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
83131 review
MATH0001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1