AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thomas Harjuno

MATH263 · STAT227 · MATH112 · STATS227 · MAT262 · TRIG54 · MATH120 · MATH84 · UPPERMATH · MATH31 · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH21 · MATH270 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
35.71%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Take him only if you want a rigorous math challenge and and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely tough graderTest heavyHigh rigorPolarizing teacherNot an easy A
  • Students consistently describe his math courses as very difficult, test-heavy, and unforgiving.
  • Some serious math students praise his rigor, clarity, and preparation for advanced work.
  • Many students warn against taking him if they want a reasonable grade or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students repeatedly say an A , and sometimes still feels unlikely.

Both online and easy A.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The material and exams are intellectually demanding, fast, proof-heavy, and .

Online and evidence much broader.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Students repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts survival, and .

The , while online reviews focus more on tests and grading.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

He is recommended only for serious math learners, while many because of and tests.

, though a few in-person and one online review praise his rigor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Reviews repeatedly describe no curve, no , tough point deductions, and very few high grades.

Format shift

Online reviews mention no curve and nitpicking, while and difficult test scoring.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students report , and major time demands.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes or tests, while and difficult preparation.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

some students praise deep teaching and clarity, while many report , rude comments, or poor support.

Format shift

Online reviews are split between awful and excellent, while polarization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

95/100

Grades are dominated by quizzes, tests, and finals, often with .

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, but the dominant pattern is , and strong learning for prepared students.

Main concern

Students who are not strong or highly motivated in math may struggle badly or drop.

What students said

“ if you expect an easy A.”
MATH263
“ .”
MATH227
“On the summer session you need to seriously spend at least 4 hours a day studying to pass.”
MATH263

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe extreme difficulty, test-heavy grading, little grade support, and one positive note about detailed lectures.

Main concern

Grades and .

What students said

“I will PURPOSELY make this course hard enough,”
MAT262
“ ”
MAT262
“Shares his lecture notes which ”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and high risk because , and sometimes proctored.

Proctored Online TestsTest HeavyNo CurveHard TestsPop QuizzesMandatory Work Showing

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe timed , and one note that notes are allowed on the final.

Timed ExamsPop QuizzesHard TestsShow Work RequiredNotes Allowed On Final
“ and .”
MATH227
“DO NOT expect any test droped, curved or in the final.”
MATH263
“ !”
MATH263

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention proctored tests, heavy quizzes and , and , but do not prove webcam or Lockdown Browser use.

Proctored TestsTest HeavyNo CurveStrict GradingFew Grade Buffers
“Shares his lecture notes which ”
MATH227
“ ”
MAT262
“Grade ”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you expect an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He is hard but and cared about everyone in his class.”

⚖️

12/100

“ ”

📈 Difficulty Level

18/100

“ if you expect an easy A.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you expect an easy A.
  • His lectures are good but his tests are very difficult and .
  • On the summer session you need to seriously spend at least 4 hours a day studying to pass.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • and .
  • Grade

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will challenge you and you will learn.
  • He teaches clearly and he is approachable outside class, BUT the rigor of
  • Gets off topic too quickly, and never really learned from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews over many years show a strong, consistent pattern of high difficulty and polarizing teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 516
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH22714 reviews
MATH26313 reviews
MATH2706 reviews
MAT2622 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH2622 reviews
MATH312 reviews
STAT2272 reviews
STATS2272 reviews
MATH1201 review
MATH211 review
MATH841 review
TRIG541 review
UPPERMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 3