AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lopez Emma

MATH260 · MATH125 · MATH236 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

unless you can teach yourself a difficult math course with little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear teachingOverwhelming homeworkTough gradingPoor supportDisorganized classes
  • and little help when they ask questions.
  • Workload is heavy and the available reviews.
  • and the overall student tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students report harsh grading, no , heavy work, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The math content feels much harder because , and practice does not prepare students for tests.

to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention lateness, early departures, and canceled classes, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews mention class meetings, and they focus .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students overwhelmingly discourage taking her because they feel unsupported, overloaded, and poorly prepared for exams.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation signal is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Multiple reviews tag her as a and report low grades despite heavy work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students repeatedly describe tons of homework and overloaded coursework.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and they consistently describe it as heavy.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students describe poor explanations, weak responsiveness to questions, and disorganized class time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are consistently negative about teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and a final, suggesting both assignments and exams matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and poor responsiveness to student confusion.

Main concern

Students report that questions are not answered well and .

What students said

“No real help, lacking empathy towards students who want to learn.”
MATH125
“About 95% the class dropped after the , homework or quizzes do not correlate with her exams.”
MATH260
“This professor overloads everyone with homework.”
MATH236

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say practice materials and .

Difficult ExamsPoor Exam AlignmentMultiple Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

aligned with notes, homework, quizzes, or practice tests.

Difficult ExamsPoor Exam AlignmentMultiple Tests
“the exams”
MATH260
“ real test.”
MATH236

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No real help, lacking empathy towards students who want to learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Tons of work without a whole lot of explanations”

⚖️

5/100

“No .”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“This professor overloads everyone with homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't give more examples when you ask.
  • Her teaching skills are horrible.
  • No real help, lacking empathy towards students who want to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tons of work without a whole lot of explanations
  • i still failed.
  • No .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • the exams
  • real test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed in-person reviews across several years are consistent, though the sample is small and somewhat old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1253 reviews
MATH2361 review
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values