AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Angelo Villavicencio

E3086 · MATHMATH · PHIL20 · MATH3841 · A1 · MATH115 · PHILO20 · MATH17528 · PHILOSOPHY20 · PHILO020 · PHIL20ETHICS · MATH125 · E3822 · 70 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a , and steady effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math teachingCaring and availablePractice-heavyLenient opportunitiesHighly recommended
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his ability to make math understandable and support struggling learners.
  • Grades are very achievable , and use his practice materials.
  • The workload can be steady, but students often describe the effort as fair and rewarded.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very reachable for students who attend, do the practice work, and use his reviews or .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they repeatedly describe effort-based grade rewards.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The material can move fast, but students say his examples, reviews, and .

to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but many reviews warn that missing class makes passing much harder.

, and they frame it as important even when not always required.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students recommend him because , and gives practical ways to succeed.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation signal is extremely strong.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Reviews , and easy grading in some courses.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

He often assigns homework, reading, quizzes, or practice, but much of it is framed as useful preparation or .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and it varies by math versus philosophy courses.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Most students describe him as , and especially helpful for people who struggle with math.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they strongly support excellent teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine homework or , and finals.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

preparation, and fair chances to pass, while noting homework and attendance matter.

Main concern

Some students find his pace fast or his style intimidating, and skipping class can hurt badly.

What students said

“Professor Villavicencio provides a lot of help to make sure you understand the material.”
MATH125
“I'm terrible at math so for me to get an A in his class you know he knows his stuff.”
MATH115
“You need to be there everyday or else you will miss important notes.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many reviews describe student-friendly tests with , and opportunities.

Take-Home TestsTake-Home FinalOpen NotesChapter Reviews AllowedExtra Credit Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention take-home tests, take-home finals, open notes or , and chapter reviews allowed on tests.

Take-Home TestsTake-Home FinalOpen NotesChapter Reviews Allowed
“ and .”
PHILO20
“ and chapter review which definitely helped me keep my grade.”
MATH115
“The .”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Villavicencio provides a lot of help to make sure you understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“This guy will teach you math in a way that is as clear and simple, he really wants his students to understand the process”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“I really wish he taught all the math classes at Elac!”

⚖️ Grade Payoff

86/100

“Easy A if you pay attention and show up for class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches you new ways to if your not so good in math, like myself.
  • and teaches extraordinarly well.
  • Very intelligent man. I hate math but hes been a huge help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is an easy A as long as you do the work.
  • As long as you do the ."
  • Do the .

Theme 3

📝

  • The .
  • and .
  • He provides a lot of practice quizzes and test, if you do them you are sure to pass the class as .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

70

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

consistent positive pattern with a few useful cautions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 58
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11519 reviews
MATH1256 reviews
PHIL206 reviews
PHILO204 reviews
PHILOSOPHY203 reviews
Show 9 more courses
38232 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
PHIL20ETHICS2 reviews
A11 review
E30861 review
E38221 review
MATH175281 review
MATH38411 review
PHILO0201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 4 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2