AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mihyung Kim

MATH227 · MATH125 · STAT227 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Take Mihyung Kim only if you can learn math independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast LecturesTough GradingTest HeavyLimited HelpMixed Experiences
  • Most negative , and exams that feel poorly aligned with preparation.
  • A few students found the class straightforward when they attended, completed work, and .
  • In-person reviews are mostly negative, while the limited online evidence and a very poor experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for students who show up and do the work, but most comments point , and little room to recover.

Online evidence is mixed and limited, while a high grade.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The math content is not always described as impossible, but the fast pace and .

Online comments include one straightforward-material review, but and unclear explanations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several in-person comments imply attendance is essential, with one tag saying students will not pass if .

Attendance concerns come from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students would not take her again because they found the , and support limited.

Online reviews are split, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a and describe and finals.

Format shift

The , while online evidence mentions fair opportunity but is too limited to offset it.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and test preparation demands.

Format shift

Workload complaints are mainly in-person, while online reviews do not clearly prove workload level.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students often say she moves , and gives limited help despite some positive comments about being nice.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is split, while few positive exceptions.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Reviews describe the course as and finals and smaller roles for .

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, but dominate grades.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and exams that students felt did not match the review material.

Main concern

Students who need slow explanations or flexible support report struggling badly.

What students said

“She goes through the chapters very fast and doesnt know how to explain the math problems step by step to the students that asked for help .”
MATH125
“ guide.”
MATH227
“The and .”
STAT227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are and one severe complaint about teaching quality.

Main concern

The online sample is too small and sharply divided to prove a reliable pattern.

What students said

“Material is straightforward and .”
MATH227
“Horrible professor should not be teaching”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest evidence shows a and exams can feel strict or poorly aligned with preparation.

Test HeavyFinal HeavyReview May Not Match ExamQuizzes Prepare For Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams that may not match review materials, but do not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyFinal HeavyReview May Not Match ExamQuizzes Prepare For Tests
“ guide.”
MATH227
“The and .”
STAT227
“ , but they prepare you for the test!”
MATH227

Online

and tricky or test-heavy work, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Test HeavyRelevant Test Prep
“Material is straightforward and .”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She goes through the chapters very fast and doesnt know how to explain the math problems step by step to the students that asked for help . Avoid taking her for math 125”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She goes through the chapters very fast and doesnt know how to explain the math problems step by step to the students that asked for help .”

⚖️

20/100

“There is no room to try and improve grade.”

🧪

28/100

“ guide.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She writes super fast and teaches while we write our notes.
  • Does not wait for everyone to understand section, as long as 2-3 people gets it she moves on.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and .
  • Just do and you will pass.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • guide.
  • No study guides she gives you worksheets at the end of each chapter and has you study of those but they are not the same as the exams.
  • , but they prepare you for the test!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years give consistent evidence of fast pacing and , though online evidence is limited.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2276 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
228201 review
STAT2271 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1