AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rouben Gasparian

MATH105 · MATH125S · MATH125 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself under a heavy and strict math workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesHeavy homeworkStrict gradingRushed paceAvoided by students
  • All analyzed reviews are strongly negative and rate both quality and difficulty at the .
  • and little time to understand material.
  • Workload and as harsh, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears extremely hard because students , and no meaningful .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The course feels much harder because , and packed with many problems.

, and they consistently describe severe difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

Multiple tags say skipping class means you will not pass, and comments describe strict classroom control.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking him because the and the workload is punishing.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students report tough grading, little , and poor outcomes such as F and D- grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of homework and hundreds of problems at a time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students describe lectures as , and .

Format shift

, and they are uniformly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and problem sets more than exams, with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students consistently describe , and .

Main concern

while handling many problems and strict class expectations.

What students said

“Terrible at lectures, little to no opportunities and lots of homework.”
MATH125
“He makes a lot of mistakes and and rushes material”
19466
“really bad at teaching and you will get in trouble for asking your neighbor for help in class”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible at lectures, little to no opportunities and lots of homework.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“He makes a lot of mistakes and and rushes material”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“He has students do hundreds of problems at a time”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

0/100

“If !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terrible at lectures, little to no opportunities and lots of homework.
  • He makes a lot of mistakes and and rushes material
  • really bad at teaching and you will get in trouble for asking your neighbor for help in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He has students do hundreds of problems at a time
  • little to no opportunities

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

There are five consistent reviews across several years, but the sample is small and some comments are vague or biased.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1252 reviews
194661 review
MATH1051 review
MATH125S1 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values