AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Kazimir

MATH227STATS · MATH263 · STATS227 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH230 · CALC262 · MATH241 · MATH261 · MATH262 · MATH227 · COLLGALGE · MATH125 · TRIG1 · MATH270 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you are willing to keep up with homework, because and strongly tied to practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsHomework-based examsHelpful professorLots of homeworkGenerally fair grading
  • Most students describe him as , and fair, especially when students do the homework.
  • Grades are usually manageable because , though .
  • The single online review is very positive, while about organization and workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The A is realistic for students who do the homework because .

The online review supports flexibility, while strongly predicts exam success.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Math content can require effort, but and homework-based tests make it manageable.

The online review is supportive but limited, while in-person reviews show easier outcomes .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Reviews suggest attending and keeping up helps a lot, but there is .

The online review shows flexible Zoom support, while and exam prep.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend him because , and fair when students do the assigned work.

The one online review is strongly positive, and the much larger in-person set is mostly positive with workload caveats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Tests often match , and grading is usually described as fair.

Format shift

Online evidence is too limited for grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Many students say the class is manageable, but recurring comments describe lots of homework and frequent quizzes.

Format shift

The online review does not emphasize workload, while .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students commonly describe him as , and willing to explain, despite some complaints about pace and organization.

Format shift

Online evidence is very positive but limited, and .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and finals, with exams often based on homework.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment details, while the online review .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person , and homework-aligned exams, but some cite lots of homework and slow organization.

Main concern

Students who dislike homework or need a .

What students said

“ so it shouldn't be difficult to earn a good grade in the class.”
MATH245
“Questions on tests and the book.”
MATH241
“this guy asks you to do every single odd problem in the chapter”
MATH262

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is very positive and , and support outside class.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“He offered several zoom classes which were very useful.”
MATH125
“Thank You Dr. K for being so flexible and understanding.”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as based on homework and examples, with some mentions of curves, , and .

Homework-based examsExtra credit mentionedCurves mentionedTake-home quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe exams as homework-based and generally reasonable, with some mentions of , curves, and .

Homework-based examsExtra credit mentionedCurves mentionedTake-home quizzes mentioned
“ so it shouldn't be difficult to earn a good grade in the class.”
MATH245
“Questions on tests and the book.”
MATH241
“ , make up tests”
MATH261

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the homework and pay attention to his lectures and you will do great on the tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ .”

📈 Easy A Path

82/100

“ ，IF YOU DO ALL THE ””

⚖️

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely good professor, very good and but also very fair.
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📚

  • Make sure you do all .
  • Questions on tests and the book.
  • he gives a lot of work, but if you do it, you'll get the most out of the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and will work with you if you're having trouble.
  • He gives big help in or after class to whoever wants to learn.
  • Have any issues, you can just tell him and he will come up with a compromise.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews across many years give a detailed and mostly consistent picture, though only one review is online.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2456 reviews
MATH2616 reviews
MATH2415 reviews
MATH2625 reviews
MATH1254 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH2273 reviews
MATH2703 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH2632 reviews
2411 review
CALC2621 review
COLLGALGE1 review
MATH227STATS1 review
MATH2301 review
STATS2271 review
TRIG11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values