AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

A El-Abyad

MATH241 · MATH227 · MATH115 · MATH125 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take A El-Abyad only if you can learn independently and avoid him for Math 227 if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough graderAccent can be hardLenient in lower mathHomework driven
  • Reviews split sharply by course, with Math 227 drawing severe criticism and Math 125 getting many positive comments.
  • Students often say exams are difficult or test heavy, but some and .
  • The main risk is unclear or fast teaching, especially for students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Getting an A can be easy in some Math 125 sections with homework-like exams and , but Math 227 reviews describe hard tests and .

Online evidence is easy and lenient, while in-person evidence is split between easy Math 125 and difficult Math 227.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not consistently hard, but unclear lectures, fast pacing, and .

The lone online review calls the class easy, while 227.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

, but some comments mention in-class and lab hours that reward showing up.

, while in-person evidence suggests attendance helps through examples, , and lab requirements.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students recommend him for some lower-level math courses but strongly warn against Math 227 because of and difficult exams.

, while in-person recommendations depend heavily on course and year.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some reviews call him lenient, but repeated Math 227 complaints describe tough grading and .

Format shift

as lenient, while in-person grading ranges from easy Math 125 to strict Math 227.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and group projects make the workload feel heavy in several reviews.

Format shift

Online work is homework based but manageable, while and test pressure.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Positive comments mention patience and caring, but many students report , and a hard-to-understand accent.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while and often negative for Math 227.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Many reviews emphasize tests, quizzes, finals, homework-based exams, and .

Format shift

Online assessment is described as , while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with early Math 125 praise but many Math 227 complaints about unclear teaching and .

Main concern

Many students say lectures are and .

What students said

“ and many questions have three parts for each.”
MATH227
“Really easy class. His quizzes and .”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is strongly positive and describes a lenient, homework-based class.

Main concern

The single online review still notes a heavy accent.

What students said

“ .”
MATH125
“Great teacher. Easy class”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness varies by course, with some homework-like multiple-choice exams and many Math 227 .

Homework-Like ExamsMultiple Choice QuizzesTest HeavyFinal ExamNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and free-response formats, quizzes, a final, and difficult Math 227 exams.

Test HeavyMultiple ChoiceFree ResponseFinal Exam
“ . The switch from multiple choice to regular working out the problem.”
MATH227
“ , but final and .”
MATH227

Online

The online review says exams use homework questions with different numbers, but .

Homework-Like ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
MATH125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to leave class not understanding what .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“He goes through the slides so fast doesn't give you a .”

⚖️

35/100

“ .”

📚 Easy A Potential

55/100

“Got perfect because he gets the problems straight from the hw.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He writes small! He has a thick accent that makes it harder to understand.
  • He is very nice when students ask questions and on the board.
  • Worst teacher in the math department. Too lazy to give , and does problems in his head.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and many questions have three parts for each.
  • Really easy class. His quizzes and .
  • odd number, will be given if you do all problem;

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendations

  • If he is the last math teacher for another school or wait till the next semester.
  • Recommend this teacher!!!
  • if you're willing to do the hw

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because it uses 26 reviews across many years, with a clear course-level split between Math 125 praise and Math 227 criticism.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH12511 reviews
MATH22711 reviews
MATH2412 reviews
1251 review
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 5