AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

David Seetao

CIS101 · CIS210 · COSCI237 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTest HeavyTough GraderPoor Exam AlignmentUnresponsive
  • Students consistently describe the teaching as confusing and unhelpful.
  • Grades appear heavily driven by exams, including .
  • All analyzed students rated him poorly and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because and students report .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content may not be inherently advanced, but and skipped material make it hard to learn.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students strongly advise against taking him because of , and unfair-feeling exams.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students describe tough grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The main burden is exam pressure rather .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and disconnected from exams.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

95/100

Reviews repeatedly say grades are driven almost entirely by tests and finals.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently , and weak support.

Main concern

Students say while lectures do not prepare them well.

What students said

“ and confused professor.”
CIS101
“ .”
CIS210
“Graded entirely on tests but the class.”
COSCI237

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the central risk, with students reporting trick questions, uncovered material, and poor administration.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsFinal Timing IssueMaterial Not Covered

Assessment risk

Strict

10/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading with and material that was not covered.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsMaterial Not CoveredFinal Timing Issue
“He grades heavily using exams, which have trick questions that make no sense and are made specifically to make you fail”
CIS101
“ and we lost time.”
CIS210
“the class.”
COSCI237

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting consistent themes in teaching and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ and confused professor.”

🧪

10/100

“He grades heavily using exams, which have trick questions that make no sense and are made specifically to make you fail”

👎 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Skipped a lot of materials.
  • In no way does he provide hands on activity to get a .

Theme 2

📉 About Exams And Grades

  • Graded entirely on tests but the class.
  • He grades heavily using exams, which have trick questions that make no sense and are made specifically to make you fail
  • and we lost time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and highly consistent across multiple courses.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CIS1011 review
CIS2101 review
COSCI2371 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1