AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

San Tan

STATS227 · MATH227 · MATH227S · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are strong in math, study independently, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyLots Of HomeworkPolarizing LecturesLow Flexibility
  • Reviews are polarized, with a while most describe poor support and .
  • The course is not an easy A because students , and lots of homework.
  • Online and , though online evidence is more split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A requires serious effort because students report , and lots of homework.

Both formats show risk, but and heavy homework.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Math 227 is described as , and unless students keep up closely.

Online evidence is mixed, while lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Reviews suggest attendance matters because students say skipping class hurts performance, but .

In-person reviews emphasize needing to attend, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend him because they , and exams that feel disconnected from help received.

Online reviews are split, while strong positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students call him a and exams.

Format shift

reviews also raising test concerns.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and frequent exams.

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly documented in in-person reviews, while online and lectures.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A few students praise his explanations, but most say he is unclear, unhelpful, or unwilling to answer questions.

Format shift

Online reviews are split, while positive outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Grades , and a limited number of graded items.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe tough , and heavy homework.

Main concern

Students often say lectures and .

What students said

“Definitely not an easy A you really have to work hard.”
MATH227
“He grades very tough on the exams”
MATH227
“ and you will learn a lot.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews conflict sharply, with one student praising support and and little help.

Main concern

Online students may face timed tests and limited review access.

What students said

“He gives you every resource you need to understand the material.”
MATH227S
“ and you cant review your answer before you submit the test .”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and limited chances to recover.

Timed Online TestsNo Review Before SubmitOpen Book Pop QuizzesTough ExamsFrequent Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and frequent summer exams, but does not clearly prove closed-book testing.

Open Book Pop QuizzesTough ExamsFrequent Exams
“ and notes.”
MATH227
“ and lots of homework!”
MATH227
“exams are every Thursday and on the last and .”
MATH227

Online

Online evidence explicitly describes timed tests with no answer review before submission, but does not prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Timed Online TestsNo Review Before Submit
“ and you cant review your answer before you submit the test .”
MATH227
“1 shot to answer.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely not an easy A you really have to work hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 and consistent grading risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and have nothing to do with the exams.”

⚖️

20/100

“He was a small mistakes.”

🧪

25/100

“ and you cant review your answer before you submit the test .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gives you every resource you need to understand the material.
  • and have nothing to do with the exams.
  • He doesnt work with you in fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Definitely not an easy A you really have to work hard.
  • He grades very tough on the exams
  • if you do the .

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests And Quizzes

  • and you cant review your answer before you submit the test .
  • and notes.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, despite a few strong positive outliers.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH2278 reviews
MATH227S1 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1