AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zhong Zhang

MATH262 · MATH235 · MATH227S · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if the course is online or you are ready to teach yourself for difficult tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTest HeavyTough GradingOnline Better Than In Person
  • , but in-person reviews are strongly negative.
  • Students describe hard tests and .
  • Grades reported are low, so this is not an easy A course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Reported grades are low and students say the tests are hard, so earning an A likely takes major effort.

The online review is positive but gives no easy A evidence, while and low grades.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content feels hard because students describe and .

Online evidence sounds manageable, but and difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though one tag warns that skipping class makes passing unlikely.

Only in-person tags mention class attendance risk, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most reviews advise against taking him because the and test heavy.

Online recommendation is strong, but and discourage taking him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students , and tests that do not match instruction.

Format shift

The , while in-person reviews point to strict and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The main burden is test preparation and .

Format shift

Online workload is not clearly described, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

One online student liked the lectures, but .

Format shift

Teaching appears much stronger online than in person based on the available comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Comments and as the main assessment concern.

Format shift

, while the online review does not describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and grading that does not match what is taught.

Main concern

Students may need outside resources to pass.

What students said

“His lectures are so confusing and .”
MATH235
“He doesnt grade on what he teaches and he has a heavy accent.”
MATH262

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review praises the , and accessibility.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one positive review.

What students said

“love his lectures and class. .”
MATH227S

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe hard, test-heavy assessment, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyStudy Sheet Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules.

Hard TestsTest HeavyStudy Sheet Mismatch
“His lectures are so confusing and .”
MATH235
“ .”
MATH262

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Eventually I ended up just watching videos on YouTube to try and but I failed his class anyway.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“His lectures are so confusing and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“He doesnt grade on what he teaches and he has a heavy accent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • love his lectures and class. .
  • His lectures are so confusing and .

Theme 2

📝 About Tests

  • he gives a study sheet before the test but it doesnt help at all
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online view relies on a single comment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH227S1 review
MATH2351 review
MATH2621 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values