AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mitchell Gordon

DIFF275 · MATH263 · MATH125 · MATH3813 · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATH261 · MATH120 · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH260 · MATH275 · MATH270 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take him if you want strong math teaching and can handle test-heavy .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing LecturesTest HeavyTheory FocusedHelpfulHard Exams
  • and willingness to help.
  • Grades usually depend on a small number of tests and a final, so .
  • Lower-level courses can feel easy, but calculus and advanced classes often require real study and theory comfort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students report easy A outcomes, but many say , and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

, but theory-heavy calculus, proofs, and advanced topics keep the content from being easy.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

tracked, but students repeatedly say lectures are important for passing.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for and and occasional disorganization.

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grading is usually fair but not lenient because tests dominate the grade and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

but not collected, yet students still need regular practice because .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

The dominant pattern is clear, detailed, patient math teaching with strong notes and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Many reviews say grades are based on three tests or homework credit.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and humor, but warn that and can be hard.

Main concern

Your grade can depend heavily on a .

What students said

“Gordon is a must for any math class.”
MATH262
“ but hard.”
MATH261

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the main grade driver, often hard, sometimes no-calculator, and .

Test HeavyNo CalculatorThree Midterms And FinalHard TestsNo Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly show a test-heavy class with hard exams, no calculator in some calculus sections, and .

No CalculatorThree Tests And FinalHard TestsStudy Guide
“There wasn't anything in ”
MATH262
“3 exams + final. . but hard.”
MATH261

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are looking for someone !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grade effort. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“he teaches calculus so well.”

🧪

36/100

“You are graded only on 3 tests and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Definitely one of the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very easy to understand.
  • !
  • He taught well and explained it again if the concept was not grasped.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • He only gives like 3 midterms and the final, but so .
  • but hard.
  • 3 easy tests & final...No HW!! Easy A

Theme 3

📚 About Effort

  • As long as you follow his lectures and do all the .
  • if you want to pass the tests and class.
  • But of course your gonna have to try or why else are you in collage?

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 in-person reviews across many years with repeated agreement on excellent lectures and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 513
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2607 reviews
MATH2627 reviews
MATH2616 reviews
MATH1155 reviews
MATH2275 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH1204 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH2633 reviews
MATH2703 reviews
MATH2753 reviews
2621 review
DIFF2751 review
MATH1051 review
MATH38131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1