AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hee Rhyum Kim

MATH125 · MATH241 · MATH110 · MATH137 · MATH3821 · MATH260 · MATH1254436 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him only if and , because the grading may be easier than the learning experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKind professorAccent barrierSelf-study neededEasy testsMixed teaching clarity
  • Students agree he is kind and often willing to help, but teaching clarity is inconsistent.
  • Several reviews say his accent and or tutoring.
  • Grades can be manageable because , and he offers drops or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades can be attainable because tests may be easy and there are drops or , but weak .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content itself is standard to challenging, and the course feels .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, but , and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not give a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student can learn independently despite accent and .

All recommendation evidence is in person, with sharply mixed comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention , and , though grading varies by course.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and book work are regular in some classes, but and homework may not always be collected.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

He is described as nice and sometimes clear, but , and self-teaching lower the score.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews mention , and exam questions more than major projects.

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split between and kind and students who felt they had to teach themselves.

Main concern

The if his accent or textbook-based style is .

What students said

“his teaching style will result in you teaching yourself at home or attending tutoring”
MATH137
“his tests weren't hard, he drops the and let us do a ”
MATH125
“He made math easy for me to understand.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes with some lenient policies, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

TestsQuizzesDropped lowest testMake-up examExtra credit on tests

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, including dropped scores and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

QuizzesTestsDropped lowest testMake-up examExtra credit on tests
“Quizzes, and 4 tests.”
MATH110
“his tests weren't hard, he drops the and let us do a ”
MATH125
“He , and the .”
MATH1254436

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“his teaching style will result in you teaching yourself at home or attending tutoring since he doesn't offer any office hours.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“This professor won't teach you anything unless the class asks him to teach STEP BY STEP.”

📈

72/100

“his tests weren't hard, he drops the and let us do a ”

👍 Recommendation Level

55/100

“If you can get past his accent, he's actually a very good teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He "teaches" by following the textbook word for word and doesn't properly show each step/concept
  • you to see on the whiteboard.
  • and can teach clearly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • his tests weren't hard, he drops the and let us do a
  • unless there is a .
  • It gets harder along the semester.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Great Professor! .
  • He is one of the nicest professor in ELAC.
  • he means well, he just cant teach well....

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The sample has only 9 in-person reviews with strong disagreement, but the comments are detailed enough to identify recurring strengths and risks.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1103 reviews
MATH1251 review
MATH12544361 review
MATH1371 review
MATH2411 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH2601 review
MATH38211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values