AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vage Avakyan

MATH1108089 · MATHMATH · MATH112 · MATH125 · MATH245 · MATH105 · MATH115 · MATH101 · MATH0955 · MATH131 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH260 · E0313345 · MATH270 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are already strong in math, comfortable self-teaching, and tolerant of a strict classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHard To UnderstandTest HeavyStrict StyleSelf Teaching Required
  • Most students describe severe clarity problems, especially with , and communication.
  • The course is often hard because math content is demanding and his teaching style adds confusion.
  • A minority of serious, attentive students found him caring or helpful, but the overall tone is strongly risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

An A is possible for disciplined students, but , and self-teaching make it high effort.

The single online review is very hard, while extremely difficult.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Math content becomes harder because many students , and difficult to understand.

Online evidence says lessons are rushed, while and a strong accent.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because multiple reviews say skipping class will hurt and participation matters.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and negative classroom interactions.

Both online and providing much stronger support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough grader and .

Format shift

Online evidence calls him a tough grader, while grading.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of , and heavy study needs.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions lots of homework, while , and test-heavy grading.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most comments say his explanations are unclear, rushed, hard to understand, or discouraging, despite a few positive reviews.

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly negative, while but mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and test-heavy tags over assignments.

Format shift

Online evidence includes tests and homework, while and test-heavy grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and difficult tests.

Main concern

Many students could not understand the lectures and felt criticized when asking questions.

What students said

“Class is very difficult due to his methods of teaching and his accent is very thick .”
MATH125
“Knicks of ”
MATH245

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative, citing rushed , and lots of homework.

Main concern

Online support and as very poor.

What students said

“He rushes through his lessons and .”
MATH227
“If you have problems submitting tests or .”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as difficult and strictly graded, but reviews do not clearly .

Tough TestsTest HeavyStrict GradingPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, midterm, or final rules.

Tough TestsTest HeavyStrict GradingPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
MATH125
“ , and .”
MATH245

Online

The online review mentions tests and submission problems, but it does not clearly .

Tough TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“If you have problems submitting tests or .”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom experience. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“He rushes through his lessons and .”

⚖️

18/100

“Knicks of points for every little thing, 1 missing problem from the the homework on 1 section = -30points on entire chapter.”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“Look for another professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • .
  • He .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Want an A? don't be lazy, do your work and study.
  • He is a but as long as you pay attention you should not have a problem passing his class.

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Experience

  • He makes his students feel dumb for needing more clarification.
  • Only stupid people ask these questions
  • There is constant bickering and arguing with students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of , and low recommendation.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH1153 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH2273 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH2452 reviews
MATH2602 reviews
1101 review
1251 review
E03133451 review
MATH09551 review
MATH1011 review
MATH11080891 review
MATH1121 review
MATH1311 review
MATH2701 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1