AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Cho

MATH227 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself statistics and tolerate a very difficult class experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderHeavy workloadSelf-teaching requiredHigh dropout risk
  • Most students describe the class as extremely and not supportive.
  • Online feedback is , and many failing grades.
  • study guides, but most in-person reviews report self-teaching and poor outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

to an A, but most reviews report Fs, withdrawal, tough grading, and high effort.

, while in-person evidence is mostly harsh with one exception about easy tests.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students repeatedly describe the course as , and dependent on self-teaching.

Both formats suggest hard learning conditions, with online comments stressing poor support and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One in-person tag says skipping class means you will not pass, and .

The ; the online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly warn others away because they found the , and grade outcomes poor.

Both formats are negative, though the only positive .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tags and and withdrawal outweighing one easy-test comment.

Format shift

Online evidence says many students failed, while and one lenient-test exception.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students mention lots of , and a test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload signals, with online citing lots of homework and , and tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most reviews describe unclear explanations, impatience, a hard-to-understand accent, and needing to teach yourself.

Format shift

Online complaints focus on lack of help, while and self-teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The comments emphasize tests, study guides, and .

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly describe exam structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly very negative, with , and heavy difficulty, despite one review saying tests were easy.

Main concern

The and a high risk of poor grades or dropping.

What students said

“You teach yourself.”
MATH227
“only 5 stayed including me.”
MATH227
“ .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes , and many students failing.

Main concern

The main concern is having .

What students said

“ and is very impatient”
MATH227
“most ppl got F's”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews conflict because one student says tests are very easy with study guides, while others describe the course as test-heavy and tough without proving a .

Study Guides Similar To TestsEasy Tests ReportedTest HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test-heavy grading, but do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book status, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Study Guides Similar To TestsEasy Tests ReportedTest Heavy
“ .”
MATH227
“study guides that are basically the tests”
MATH227
“Test heavy”
MATH227

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ and is very impatient”

⚠️ Grade Risk

18/100

“most ppl got F's.”

🧪

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You teach yourself.
  • and is very impatient
  • Hard to understand writing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • most ppl got F's.
  • class started with 40 students and by the end of the semester, only 5 stayed
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and in-person formats are consistent in negative tone, but the sample is small and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2275 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1