AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Huygenx Ngo

MATH115 · MATH125 · MATH110 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are very independent in math and comfortable with high-stakes exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyHigh Failure RiskConfusing LecturesFew GradesNo Homework
  • Most negative reviews say the course depends heavily on only a midterm and final.
  • Students report , and .
  • A few students praise his help and clarity, but the overall recommendation pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Even with because the grade can depend almost .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students describe , skipped steps, hard-to-understand explanations, and tests that feel different from class material.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is not clearly described as formally mandatory, but missing lecture notes and review .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students would not recommend him because the , and difficult to recover in.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Grades are often based on only a midterm and final, and students say one bad test can effectively fail the class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

There is little or , but the low workload .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students praise his help, but , and poor alignment with exams.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

96/100

Reviews consistently say grades are based mainly or entirely on a midterm and final.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

grades often depend on two major tests and many students struggle or withdraw.

Main concern

A midterm and room to recover.

What students said

“all class only depends on 2 grades, mid term and final.”
MATH125
“The class started with 30+ students and ended with 7.”
MATH125
“Whole class ”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because the course can depend on only two major tests with little room for recovery.

Midterm and Final OnlyTest HeavyFew GradesNo Homework Buffer

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final as the main grading structure, but do not prove closed-book, proctoring, or software rules.

Midterm and Final OnlyTest HeavyFew Grades
“only has 2 tests; a .”
MATH125
“If you do bad on one of the .”
MATH125
“ .”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do bad on one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️

20/100

“all class only depends on 2 grades, mid term and final.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“I didn't learned anything instead I was confused the entire time, he skipped a lot of steps.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ if you are struggling with math.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • Whole class is graded on just midterm & final, no homework, lectures every class but and helps if you do not understand something.
  • .
  • Grade is based of midterm and final.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches his lessons backwards
  • Instructor was very hard to understand because of his heavy ascent.
  • Professor Ngo is an amazing instructor who truly cares about the students learning.

Theme 3

📉 About Student Outcomes

  • I ended up drooping the class because I was afraid of failing.
  • The class started with 30+ students and ended with 7.
  • only 4 students got a passing grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 7 detailed in-person reviews with , and , though opinions are polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1255 reviews
MATH1101 review
MATH1151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1