AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Arshak Gharibjanyan

STATS227 · MATH245 · MATH227 · MATH1040 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if , and tolerate a polarizing lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teachingHard testsCurved gradingCaring for someUnclear lectures
  • Reviews split sharply between students who found him caring and .
  • Tests are often described as hard, but some students say possible.
  • Attendance and because several students say lectures alone may not be enough.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A , and self-study, but and unclear lectures keep it from being low effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math and statistics content feels manageable for some students but because explanations and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

because students say missing class hurts performance, but reviews do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether the student connects with his style, since reviews are split between strong praise and strong warnings.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but at least one review says he curves everything, making outcomes more forgiving for some students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described as extreme, but , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with some students calling him clear and caring while and dismissive.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests and a and review work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with strong praise for patience and clear explanations in some math classes but and .

Main concern

Teaching clarity and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH227
“ !”
MATH245
“ and unorganized and .”
STATS227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and a final, but they do not prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book format.

Hard TestsCurved GradingFour Tests And Final

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsCurved GradingFinal Exam
“ .”
MATH227
“4 tests and .”
MATH227
“That's why he grade everything on a curve.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is an easy A if you can bear with the boring lectures that make no sense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“His teaching techniques are easy to understand.”

📈 Grade Path

58/100

“I ENDED UP HAVING AN A.”

⚠️

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He stopped lecturing halfway through the semester and would reprimand us for not knowing things if we asked questions.
  • !
  • and unorganized and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Follow his lectures and learn the formulas and you will be able to pass the class.
  • If you want an A or B you should.
  • That's why he grade everything on a curve.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • The professor would walk around and make sure each student was grasping the material.
  • He truly works with you!
  • Also doesnt have office hours.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

, but the opinions are sharply split and somewhat dated.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH2274 reviews
MATH2452 reviews
STATS2272 reviews
MATH10401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1