AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Edward Kim

MSTH260 · STATS227 · MATH105 · MATH260 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you attend and keep up with homework, but be cautious about online sections based on the one poor review.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsHomework-Based TestsHelpfulFast PacedStrong In-Person Reputation
  • , and math made easier.
  • , making grades very achievable for students who keep up.
  • The single online review is sharply negative and conflicts with the strong in-person pattern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very reachable if , and do the homework because .

, while the single online review reports a poor outcome.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students often and simple, though several warn that he moves fast.

, while the online review says questions were not answered clearly.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but multiple reviews say skipping means you will not pass or will miss key material.

The ; the online review does not clarify attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend him because and .

, while the single online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Students , and tests based directly on homework or classwork.

Format shift

; the online review does not support it.

Workload

Light

76/100

and is sometimes not due, though class pace can be demanding.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe manageable work, while the online review focuses on organization rather than workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most , and able to make math easier to understand.

Format shift

Teaching is praised strongly in person, but the and poor organization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests , and a final.

Format shift

Assessment details mostly come from in-person reviews; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly very , and fair tests tied to homework.

Main concern

He moves quickly, so skipping class or falling behind can hurt badly.

What students said

“he never skips steps!”
MATH125
“ if you do your homework you will be able to pass his class.”
MATH260
“class was very difficult, he speeds over lessons.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online , and no office hours.

Main concern

Online support may be weak based on the single review.

What students said

“He never answered questions clearly and made me feel dumb.”
MATH125
“ .”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The overall exam evidence is student-friendly because , and second chances.

Notes AllowedHomework-Based TestsEasy Tests When PreparedDropped Test

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

homework or classwork, and chances to recover grades.

Notes AllowedHomework-Based TestsDropped TestExtra Credit
“You can use notes for basically everything so as long as !”
MATH125
“The and !!”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH125

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or quiz structure.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome professor! if you have the chance!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“I have never been good at math but Prof. Kim made the class a breeze!”

📈 Effort And Grades

84/100

“ if you do your homework you will be able to pass his class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“If taking a !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he never skips steps!
  • Mr Kim such a great profesor he made class so simple and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His class is easy only if you put effort into it
  • I am at a 92% in his class now, because of .
  • He doesn't grade on the curve (usually) but he does give a lot of and gives you an .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Pace And Format

  • class was very difficult, he speeds over lessons.
  • He covers a lot in class so if because he wont go over it again.
  • He never answered questions clearly and made me feel dumb.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across many years give a consistent in-person picture, though the single online review lowers format confidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1256 reviews
MATH2603 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH2272 reviews
MATH1051 review
Show 2 more courses
MSTH2601 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values