AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shamsul Arefin

MATH227 · MATH110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedConfusing TeachingPoor PreparationAttendance MattersNice But Ineffective
  • Most reviews strongly criticize his organization, clarity, and ability to answer questions.
  • One positive , and engaging, but it is outweighed by three severe negatives.
  • Students warn that the course can hurt grades because quizzes and teaching do not match expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students , and needing to teach themselves.

compare.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content , and mismatched quizzes.

compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One review says participation matters and skipping class means you will not pass, suggesting low flexibility.

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Three of four reviews strongly discourage and grade risk.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report bad grades and quizzes not matching class work, though .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it suggests .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and quizzes than on a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most students describe him as , and unable to answer questions well.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mostly strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes and class participation but do not fully define the .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing disorganization, unclear teaching, skipped questions, and grade risk.

Main concern

The and disorganized teaching that leaves students teaching themselves.

What students said

“He seems like he doesn't really know what he's doing.”
MATH227
“ ”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes that did not match class work, but they do not .

Quizzes Not AlignedNo Clearly Proven Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove exam format or .

Quizzes Not Aligned
“ in class.”
MATH227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ him !!!! avoid this bad professor”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grades, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“when he teaches it does not really make sense.”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“ .”

⚠️ Grade Risk

25/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He seems like he doesn't really know what he's doing.
  • when he teaches it does not really make sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • in class.
  • if you dont pass his class.... its definitely not the professors fault.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and approachable.
  • but when he teaches it does not really make sense.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because , though there is one strong positive outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2273 reviews
MATH1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values