AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Senensieb DH

CAL261 · MATHMATH · MATH1234 · MATH261 · MATH120 · MATH275 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle a demanding, participation-heavy style and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturerParticipation MattersPolarizing StyleHomework ImportantPossible Easy A
  • and strong lectures.
  • Student experience is polarized, with serious complaints about tone and respect.
  • Grades can be easy for engaged students, but some report heavy work and harsh outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

77/100

Several older reviews call him an easy A with , but difficult-course complaints keep this from being effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

, but calculus and higher math reviews show the content can still be demanding.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and participation are strongly emphasized, and students warn that skipping class can lead to failure.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but harsh negative experiences make the recommendation conditional.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Some reviews describe easy A potential and , while others mention tough grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and sometimes described as heavy, but some students say it helps because it counts as .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

and , though a few report severe issues with tone and respect.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Reviews emphasize homework, quizzes, attendance, and the course.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and lectures, but negative reviews describe him as , and difficult for struggling students.

Main concern

His personality and expectations may feel intense, especially for students already struggling with math.

What students said

“he gives very good lectures.”
MATH275
“he is an awful professor, racist, mean, does not respect and silly”
MATH261
“i'm sure it is very easy to get A!”
MATH1234

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Quiz Policy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the .

Quiz Policy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Don't do too bad or miss the quiz.”
MATH1234

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He thoroughly explained the material from the ground up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He thoroughly explained the material from the ground up.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“recommend this professor for math 275”

⚖️ Grade Effort

77/100

“i'm sure it is very easy to get A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he gives very good lectures.
  • he teaches very clearly.
  • very helpful and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Easy A teacher.
  • And you because it is EXTROL CREDIT!!
  • but no A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • he gets annoyed when students are slackers or not enthusiastic or participative
  • he is an awful professor, racist, mean, does not respect and silly

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Ten in-person reviews across many years provide enough detail to identify consistent praise and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH2753 reviews
MATH12342 reviews
MATH2612 reviews
CAL2611 review
MATH1201 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1