AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

John Enomoto

CSIT · COSCI200 · CSIT201 · E1458 · COMSCIENCE · COMPUTERSCIENC · F · COMP201 · CSIT233 · CIS201 · SCI201 · COS201 · COSCI291 · COSCI201 · CSIT3355 · COCSI201 · COMSCI201 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Take him for an easy grade, but if and strong instructor involvement.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ASelf-taught feelOften lateBasic computer workMixed teaching quality
  • Students repeatedly call the class an easy A with basic Microsoft Office work.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent, with , and self-teaching.
  • and more positive than online reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Many students say the class is an automatic or easy A with basic work, , curves, and minimal difficulty.

In-person evidence is overwhelmingly easy-A focused, while online evidence is still easy but more dependent on self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course content is mostly basic Microsoft Office and computer fundamentals, which many students found very easy.

Both formats describe easy content, though online reviews mention more frustration with instructions and platform grading.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Students report and that he often lets students leave early.

The attendance flexibility evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend him for an easy grade but often warn that instruction, organization, and learning value are weak.

In-person students more often recommend him for easy credit, while online students are more split because of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Grades appear very forgiving, with curves, , and many reports of easy A outcomes.

Format shift

, while online reviews include one complaint about harder tests.

Workload

Light

82/100

Most work is basic online assignments or homework that students often complete quickly or during class.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds especially light, while online work can feel frustrating when instructions are unclear.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some students call him nice and helpful, but , and self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly mixed, while online reviews show more concern about limited instructor involvement.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Students , and finals rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Both formats use online work and tests, but in-person reviews more often mention in-class online tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews strongly emphasize easy grades, early dismissals, and basic assignments, but many also mention lateness and weak teaching.

Main concern

Students may earn an easy grade while learning less than expected.

What students said

“If you , if you want an easy A. .”
CIS201
“Easiest class I've ever taken.”
COSCI200
“He does not teach (or know how to teach), basically, you are on your own.”
CSIT233

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some calling the class easy and and poor response time.

Main concern

Online students may get little instructor support and .

What students said

“ and .”
COSCI200
“Easy class. He is a though.”
COSCI201
“Course content and exercises were straight forward, easy to understand.”
COSCI201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly, with , and one take-home final, though one online course required campus exams.

Online TestsCurved TestsTake-Home FinalNo MidtermCampus Exams For Online Class

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and a take-home final.

Online TestsCurved TestsTake-Home FinalNo Midterm
“The final is so Easy and its a . No mid Term.”
COSCI200
“Tests are taken in class, but online. .”
CSIT201
“Only gave 3 exams throughout the semester.”
CSIT201

Online

Online reviews mention online tests and one course requiring students to come to campus for exams and the final, but they .

Online TestsCampus Exams For Online Class
“ .”
E1458
“I took it online and you have to come to campus for the exams & final.”
COSCI201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you , if you want an easy A. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Pattern

94/100

“This class is an automatic A if you do you work the right way which is really easy.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“He does not teach (or know how to teach), basically, you are on your own.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

55/100

“If you , if you want an easy A. .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easiest class I've ever taken.
  • If you understand computer basics, then this is an easy A class.
  • It's hard to fail his class even when he gives out for class participation.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • but not a bad teacher.
  • good teacher, he explains things step by step to make sure you really understand

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • He is always late to class, doesn't really teach anything, bad temper and gets quite annoy when you ask him questions.
  • Professor is somewhat disorganized & has been showing up 20 min late for like 2-3 weeks now.
  • He SUCKS!!! He's Always more than 30 minutes late.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews across many years with , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 510
3 out of 510
2 out of 58
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CSIT20120 reviews
CIS2015 reviews
COSCI2004 reviews
COSCI2014 reviews
CSIT2333 reviews
Show 12 more courses
COMP2012 reviews
SCI2012 reviews
COCSI2011 review
COMPUTERSCIENC1 review
COMSCI2011 review
COMSCIENCE1 review
COS2011 review
COSCI2911 review
CSIT1 review
CSIT33551 review
E14581 review
F1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1