AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Elaine Shibata

CAOT001 · CAOT0000 · CAOT621 · CAOT062 · CAOT62 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you are already comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy WorkloadConfusing Online CourseImpatientExpensive MaterialsFast Paced
  • Online reviews are strongly negative, citing glitches, expensive materials, and heavy weekly assignments.
  • In-person reviews are mixed but often criticize impatience, rushing, and limited teaching.
  • and helpful, but it is outweighed by repeated complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A , but online reviews report heavy work, glitches, and low grades.

Online evidence suggests a hard path to a good grade, while one in-person review says the class can be easy if .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and required prior typing or Word skill.

Online reviews emphasize confusing software and prerequisites, while and limited teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

because of heavy workload, confusion, impatience, and poor support.

Online reviews are especially negative, while but still mostly critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Low grades and complaints about penalties for .

Format shift

Online reviews show the , while .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Online students report lots of lessons, lots of homework, and at least six hours of assignments per week.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, while but is less consistently quantified.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students often describe her as , and not very engaged in teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize course design and support, while and lack of instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews repeatedly describe lessons, typing work, Word tasks, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly mention assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but most complain that she is rushed, impatient, fast, and leaves students on assignments.

Main concern

Students may need to work independently because several reviews say she does not teach much.

What students said

“She teaches o.k. at least in beginning but becomes really impatient”
CAOT062
“Does not teach much as just leaves you alone .”
CAOT621
“ and easy professor.”
CAOT062

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative, with students describing confusing lessons, software glitches, expensive materials, and heavy weekly work.

Main concern

The online course may be hard to complete without strong typing, Word skills, and tolerance for software issues.

What students said

“This is not a .”
CAOT001
“Requires at least 6 hours of .”
CAOT001
“ .”
CAOT001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews give too little exam-policy evidence overall, though .

Easy Midterm MentionedExam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove broader exam rules or proctoring.

Easy Midterm Mentioned
“ letter she provides for you.”
CAOT062

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Does not teach much as just leaves you alone .”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Requires at least 6 hours of .”

⚖️

28/100

“I ended up receiving a low grade due to the fact that I did all my work in the newer version although she said it was no problem.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Format

  • This is not a .
  • The typing program has so many glitches.
  • Book and program is over $100.00 dollars.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches o.k. at least in beginning but becomes really impatient
  • She can be difficult to talk to as she usually seems really rushed, impatient.
  • Does not teach much as just leaves you alone .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Lessons are tough and confusing.
  • If you are not an average typist, you will not pass.
  • letter she provides for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across online and , though some reviews are old and one in-person review is positive.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CAOT0013 reviews
CAOT0622 reviews
CAOT6212 reviews
CAOT00001 review
CAOT621 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values