AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

C. Chen

MATH · STATS227 · MATH105 · MATH25 · MATH115 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are already strong in math, can self-teach, and can handle a strict classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict rulesConfusing lecturesRude toneHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching required
  • Many students describe her as , and difficult to approach.
  • Success , and independent study.
  • A and can help grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some reviews mention and predictable tests, but most say passing , and self-teaching.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content feels harder because and need to learn material on their own.

, so there is no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

, assigned seats, and rigid classroom rules can hurt students.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and limited help.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and quizzes can help, but and being marked wrong for method differences.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Most reviews describe , weak explanations, a harsh tone, and little patience for questions.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and homework as the main grade drivers.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about unclear teaching, strict rules, rude comments, and heavy effort demands.

Main concern

Students who need patient explanations or math support may struggle badly.

What students said

“I taught myself math in this .”
MATH125
“ !”
MATH110
“howework is a must”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a high-value final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Test HeavyDaily QuizzesFinal Worth 200 PointsPredictable Test Topics

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring requirements.

Test HeavyDaily QuizzesFinal Worth 200 Points
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”
MATH110
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH110
“the final was worth 200 points”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I taught myself math in this .”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom rules. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“I taught myself math in this .”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ if you are not good at math.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“do your hw show up to every class and she will help you pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gets mad easily if you ask her a question.
  • She basically solves the problems on the board and expects students to understand.
  • She won't help you and rushes lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and .
  • The because she tells you exactly whats on them.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Rules

  • she doesn't even call you by name! she gives you a number!
  • She assigns seats and and confusing
  • She will not even let students go to the restroom.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 27 in-person reviews with strong consistency , and low recommendation.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 58
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH12511 reviews
MATH1105 reviews
MATH2273 reviews
05631 review
1251 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH1 review
MATH -251 review
MATH 1251 review
MATH1051 review
MATH1151 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

4

C 4

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1