AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Novita Phua

MATH115 · MATH125 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take Novita Phua only if you want to learn math seriously and can handle a demanding pace.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate About MathDifficult PaceNot EasyHelpful When Prepared
  • Student experiences are sharply split between a stressful, rushed class and a passionate professor who helps serious learners.
  • The course is not an easy A, because students must keep up with homework and .
  • All evidence comes from in-person math reviews, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

An A is possible, but comments say students must keep up with and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content feels difficult mainly because the pace can be fast and problem-solving time may be limited.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student wants a serious math class rather than an easy one.

In-person reviews are mixed, and there is no online recommendation evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The A+ review suggests success is possible, but the C- review and hard-work comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and due before tests, and students who slack may fall behind.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

One student calls her passionate and great, while another says her teaching method is hard to understand.

Format shift

online data.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and tests but do not give enough detail to show an .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

can be rewarding for prepared students but stressful for students who need slower pacing.

Main concern

The main concern is fast pacing and limited in-class problem solving.

What students said

“Too difficult to understand 3 chapters in a hour classes.”
MATH115
“Overall a great professor, but not an easy one.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but the and rules are not clearly proven.

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ and it is due the day before the test.”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall a great professor, but not an easy one.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She's funny and passionate about math.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

40/100

“Do not slack or you will fall behind.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's funny and passionate about math.
  • I don't like her method of teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Too difficult to understand 3 chapters in a hour classes.
  • Overall a great professor, but not an easy one.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1151 review
MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values