AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Aiken Lenh

M215 · M0856 · MATH115 · MATH125 · M115 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Consider him if you value patience and can handle possible communication issues, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing TeachingPatient HelpConfusing CommunicationRecommended by SomeLong Lectures
  • Student opinion is sharply split, with four highly positive reviews and two very negative reviews.
  • , and willingness to help students understand concepts.
  • Negative and has communication issues, which creates real risk for some students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The A because students praise support but also report confusion and some high difficulty ratings.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content appears manageable with help, but and long lectures make it harder for some students.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show conflicting experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends on the student because while others strongly warn against taking him.

All and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

There is , though the mixed difficulty ratings suggest neither .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not heavily criticized, but and long lectures suggest a normal effort level.

Format shift

and lectures.

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

Teaching is polarizing, with several students praising patience and others calling him horrible or confusing.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews with sharply divided opinions.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments but do not clearly describe exams, homework weight, or .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss coursework, and assessment evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

patience and strong criticism of confusing teaching.

Main concern

Some students find his communication and explanations .

What students said

“Great Professor!!!! Lectures were long, but good.”
MATH115
“He does not speak good English and .”
MATH125
“He makes sure his students understand the and ask as many questions as neccessary to understand the concept.”
M0856

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is amazing! He makes sure his students understand the and ask as many questions as neccessary to understand the concept.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting the and clarity concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

“Very patient! Good instructor”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ .”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

45/100

“He does not speak good English and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor!!!! Lectures were long, but good.
  • Good professor!!!! I love the way he teaches.
  • Horrible professor!!!

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • Very patient! Good instructor
  • He makes sure his students understand the and ask as many questions as neccessary to understand the concept.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity

  • He does not speak good English and .
  • Lectures were long, but good.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews show a clear split in experience, but comments are older and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1152 reviews
M08561 review
M1151 review
M2151 review
MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values