AI Rate Professor

Engineering

William SU

ENG241 · ENG151 · EGTEK111 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

, but be ready for inconsistent teaching and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery EasyOpen Book ExamsKnowledgeableDisorganized TeachingWeak English
  • Students repeatedly call Su easy, with .
  • Teaching quality is polarized because some praise his knowledge while others describe poor organization and weak instruction.
  • The grade and can learn independently when lectures are unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

Students repeatedly say the class is easy, tests are open book or open note, and he tells students what will be tested.

All Easy A ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course feels easy to students, though .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not give a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and open-book exams, but several warn that his teaching is weak and disorganized.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with strongly mixed opinions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because students describe easy A outcomes, open materials, and advance test guidance.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload sounds light overall, though because lectures lack application.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is often called knowledgeable, but several students describe him as , and weak at teaching.

Format shift

Teaching and is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize tests, open-book exams, and experience.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but strongly agree that the class is easy and exams are student-friendly.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“Good professor. Easy Class.”
ENG151
“Has no lesson plan, so he jumps all over the place.”
ENG151
“Open books and notes.”
ENG151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

he often tells students what will be covered, making exams very student-friendly.

Open BookOpen NotesTest Content PreviewNo Computers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

94/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as open book or open notes with test content preview, while reviews do not clearly prove proctoring details beyond no computers in one comment.

Open BookOpen NotesTest Content PreviewNo Computers
“Open books and notes.”
ENG151
“Open everything except computers and friends.”
ENG151
“one class before noticeing all the content included in the test.”
ENG151

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent professor. I enjoyed the class during summer cuz no . Open books and notes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching consistency. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Potential

93/100

“Easy professor and knowledgeable!! .”

📝

94/100

“Open everything except computers and friends.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Has no lesson plan, so he jumps all over the place.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Good professor. Easy Class.
  • usually just use ur knowledge from statics and u'll get an A.
  • Easy and helpful professor! .

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • Open books and notes.
  • Open everything except computers and friends.
  • he will tell u what will be in the test.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but a weak instructor.
  • There is no coherence to his classes, so you're left with no overall sense of what he just "taught" you.
  • The instructor appeared to have little to no interest in actually teaching the subject.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because eight reviews over several years show a consistent easy-grade pattern despite mixed teaching opinions.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1516 reviews
EGTEK1111 review
ENG2411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values