AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mitesh Shah

MATH245 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can learn math independently and handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandExam-heavyPaid access codePoor explanationsHigh dropout risk
  • The single review describes and .
  • Assessment is heavy, with quizzes, three exams, and a .
  • The student strongly discourages taking the class after earning an F.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

The only review reports an F, failed quizzes, many dropped students, and no evidence of grade support.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course appears hard because and assessments covered large chunks of material.

Difficulty evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

There is no online evidence and the single .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student explicitly does not , and poor class outcomes.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

The , and severe dropout signal harsh outcomes, though evidence is limited to one review.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The class had 10 quizzes, 3 exams, a , and .

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The only review says lectures were hard to understand and the subject was explained terribly.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Assessment was dominated by quizzes, three exams, and a as a secondary component.

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review reports hard-to-understand lectures, many assessments, paid materials, and poor outcomes.

Main concern

while and exams.

What students said

“His thick accent made lectures hard to understand and explained the subject terribly”
MATH245
“Only 5 people took the .”
MATH245
“ !!”
MATH245

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a strict assessment load with many quizzes, three exams, and a , but .

10 Quizzes3 ExamsCumulative FinalOnline Homework

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review clearly reports 10 quizzes, 3 exams, and 1 cumulative final, but does not prove book or .

10 Quizzes3 ExamsCumulative Final
“Took 10 quizzes, 3 exams and 1 cumulative final.”
MATH245
“The exams covered 2 chapters each.”
MATH245

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His thick accent made lectures hard to understand and explained the subject terribly, which students failed quizzes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, cost, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“His thick accent made lectures hard to understand and explained the subject terribly”

🧪 Assessment Load

88/100

“Took 10 quizzes, 3 exams and 1 cumulative final.”

👍 Recommendation Level

10/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His thick accent made lectures hard to understand and explained the subject terribly
  • which students failed quizzes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Took 10 quizzes, 3 exams and 1 cumulative final.
  • Only 5 people took the .

Theme 3

💵 About Costs

  • buy the code and book.
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it is detailed and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2451 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values