AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Frise D P

CAOT32 · CAOT086 · CAOT · CAOT82 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the course and accept poor instruction and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor teachingSelf-taught classEasy materialUnfair grading complaintsAvoid
  • All four reviews rate the teaching quality at the lowest level and describe him as unprepared or ineffective.
  • Some students say the material can be easy if they teach themselves.
  • grades are hard to get despite completed work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

The material may be easy for self-taught students, but and not reliably easy.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students describe the class material as easy when handled independently, despite poor instruction.

Course easiness .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance does not seem valuable, but reviews do not clearly prove that .

and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students repeatedly warn against taking him because they view his teaching as unhelpful and incompetent.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

One review says he will not give A grades even with strong quiz and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

The course appears light for students who can read, practice, and teach themselves, though poor teaching increases frustration.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Every review describes very poor teaching, lack of preparation, or weak command of the material.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention chapters, practice, SAM2010 tests, quizzes, homework, and a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe poor teaching, low lecture value, and a .

Main concern

Students say he is unprepared, unhelpful, and may grade unfairly.

What students said

“This is the the material.”
CAOT32
“If ur good at teaching ur self u will pass with an A.”
CAOT82
“He won't give students A in class.”
CAOT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, homework, SAM2010 practice tests, and , but do not clearly prove a .

SAM2010 Practice TestsQuizzesHomeworkFinal Grade Risk

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and SAM2010 tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

SAM2010 TestsQuizzesHomework
“Read the chapters and practice the concept and .”
CAOT82
“even u work hard in class (got quize A & B.”
CAOT

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If ur good at teaching ur self u will pass with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“His teaching style is completely atrocious, seems like he hates teaching.”

📚 Self-Teaching Required

70/100

“If ur good at teaching ur self u will pass with an A.”

⚖️

18/100

“He won't give students A in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This is the the material.
  • .
  • He is not a good teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Bad teacher, easy class.
  • Give students grad not fair.
  • even u work hard in class (got quize A & B.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are highly consistent and span multiple years.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CAOT1 review
CAOT0861 review
CAOT321 review
CAOT821 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values