Wing Ko

MATH0991 · MATHMATH · KKKO · MATH115 · MATH260 · MATH261 · MICRO · CLAC262 · MA262 · MATHS262 · CAL262 · MATH262 · CALCULUS1 · MATH126 · MATH125 · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 65/100
RMP rating: 3.5/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 2.9

The decision

if you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesOne-Page NotesHelpful If AskedMixed ClarityTricky Tests

Students strongly disagree on teaching quality, with many finding him thorough but boring or unclear.
, but questions can be tricky and high-stakes.
weeks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Some students call him easy because of note sheets and curves, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content can feel manageable when paced slowly, but and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Multiple students say he stops taking attendance after the first few weeks or never takes roll.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

He works for patient or independent students, but many warn that lectures are boring or unclear.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, and some easy-test reports suggest leniency, but .

Format shift

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Homework is present but often spaced out, while .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

He is often called helpful and thorough, but .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and homework mainly as test preparation.

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but inconsistent math class where self-starters can do well.

Main concern

Lectures are often described as .

What students said

“ and .”
MATH125

“He also lets you use a !!”
MATH115

“his tests and as hell.”
MATH261

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are note-friendly and , but students frequently describe them as tricky or high-stakes.

One-Page NotesTricky TestsCumulative FinalCurve

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, tricky questions, and a cumulative final, but do not prove proctoring rules.

One-Page NotesTricky TestsCumulative FinalCurve

“You get to use 1 .”
MATH125

“His questions are tricky and not relevant to what he has covered.”
MATH125

“There are about 5-6 tests and a .”
MATH125

“he grades on the curve”
MATHMATH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“If you just want the but if it is required for your specific major, i suggest elsewhere.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“ and .”

📈 Grade Value

68/100

“Easy class, can use a sheet of .”

📝

66/100

“his tests and as hell.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Good Teacher. He makes math very understandable and straightforward.
He doesn't know how to teach.
good teacher, very detailed in explanations but sometimes he goes way too slow because he doesnt want to leave anyone behind.
Goes into details wayyyy too much..but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

You need to earn your grade in his class.
Should be an easy A.
worked my ass off to get a C in his calc class and i'm usually an A student

Theme 3

📝

After first two weeks of class, .
He never takes role.
and exam.
There are about 5-6 tests and a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 reviews across many years with detailed and recurring patterns despite mixed opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517

4 out of 520

3 out of 57

2 out of 58

1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH12515 reviews

MATH11510 reviews

MATH2625 reviews

MATH2614 reviews

MATHMATH3 reviews

Show 11 more courses

2612 reviews

MATH2602 reviews

CAL2621 review

CALCULUS11 review

CLAC2621 review

KKKO1 review

MA2621 review

MATH09911 review

MATH1261 review

MATHS2621 review

MICRO1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B+ 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Wing Ko

x x if you can learn independently and x x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Optional

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📈 Grade Value

📝 x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

📝 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you can learn independently and .

📝

📝