AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Elizabeth Beaudine

CAOT23 · CAOT023 · CAOT033 · LEGAL23 · CAOT24 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take Elizabeth Beaudine if you want a supportive teacher and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful ExplanationsRespectful TeacherLots Of WorkHighly RecommendedWriting Improvement
  • Students mostly describe Elizabeth Beaudine as helpful, respectful, and strong at explaining material.
  • The and lots of work, but students say .
  • The review set is small and old, so the strong positive pattern has limited current reliability.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades seem reachable because , but the work can be hard and frequent rather than effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

, though the workload and some assignments can still be hard.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

In-person .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Students recommend her because , and treats students respectfully.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Reviews suggest fair grading tied to explained work, with .

Format shift

and comes from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is moderate because students mention and lots of work, though not necessarily overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe her as , and effective at improving skills.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize homework and class work, while .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teaching, respectful treatment, and meaningful skill improvement.

Main concern

Several comments mention steady or lots of work, and one review has no useful detail.

What students said

“Her work can be hard but .”
LEGAL23
“Thanks to her, my writing has gotten significantly better.”
CAOT033
“gives lots of work but overall the class is fun.”
CAOT24

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, respect, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Her .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

87/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

55/100

“ , but not a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She answers all questions, if you don't understand, she will tell you again.
  • She's a Great teacher, enjoyed taking her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Learning

  • Her work can be hard but .
  • , but not a lot.
  • Thanks to her, my writing has gotten significantly better.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is very polite to her students.
  • She respects them, treats them like people.
  • as a teacher for any subject!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 5 , but the useful comments are detailed and mostly consistent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CAOT0231 review
CAOT0331 review
CAOT231 review
CAOT241 review
LEGAL231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values