AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Evelyn Chau

INALG125 · ABCDABCD · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are strong in math, can handle heavy workload, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkHard testsUnclear explanationsStrict gradingMixed helpfulness
  • Most reviews describe Chau as , and hard to understand.
  • Several students say tests are frequent, hard, or poorly aligned with review material.
  • A minority of and that , so the experience may depend on student preparation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and many failing classmates.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

29/100

The content may be manageable for STEM students, but most students describe the class as , and very difficult.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Students strongly warn not to miss lectures, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

, while no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students advise against taking her because , and tests are harsh.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students describe strict scoring, no , many failures, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Multiple reviews repeat that there is a lot of homework and frequent or weekly tests.

Format shift

The workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students call her nice and helpful, but , and hard-to-follow instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests, weekly tests, practice tests, and as preparation.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and impatience with questions.

Main concern

, and unclear expectations.

What students said

“More than half the class is failing.”
MATH227
“so what to study!!!”
INALG125
“Ms. and helpful.”
INALG125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and often described as hard, though and another says some notes are allowed.

Frequent TestsNo Extra CreditNotes Allowed in Some TestsDrops One Test

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and limited notes, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or final format.

Frequent TestsNo Extra CreditNotes Allowed in Some TestsDrops One Test
“Does not give .”
MATH227
“ with a partner.”
MATH110
“4 tests, drops one, lets you use a .”
INALG125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“More than half the class is failing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“A lot of homework!!!!!”

⚖️

22/100

“More than half the class is failing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She can be mean sometimes.
  • Ms. and helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • More than half the class is failing.
  • Got a B in this class.
  • if

Theme 3

📝

  • A lot of homework!!!!!
  • weekly test
  • so what to study!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight older reviews provide detailed and mostly consistent complaints, though two positive reviews create some mixed evidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2273 reviews
INALG1252 reviews
ABCDABCD1 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values