AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

TA Harjuno

MATH125 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and teach yourself beyond the homework.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard TestsPoor AlignmentHigh Difficulty
  • The .
  • The course felt very difficult despite limited evidence.
  • There is no online evidence for this professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A sounds difficult because the only student says tests did not match the taught material.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course appears challenging mainly because assessments felt disconnected from lectures and homework.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

No online evidence exists, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only detailed comment and difficulty.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The review implies strict outcomes because tests were hard and poorly aligned with preparation.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described, but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Teaching quality is weak because the only review says exams did not connect to lectures or homework.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The only concrete assessment evidence focuses on tests.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person evidence is negative and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ the homework”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring, but the as hard and misaligned.

Hard TestsPoor Lecture Alignment

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The lectures or homework, but does not prove book rules or proctoring.

Hard TestsPoor Lecture Alignment
“ the homework”
MATH125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was the hardest professor I had ever taken at ELAC.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and exams. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ the homework”

📈 Difficulty

30/100

“He was the hardest professor I had ever taken at ELAC.”

⚖️

25/100

“ the homework”

Theme 1

📘 About Course Difficulty

  • He was the hardest professor I had ever taken at ELAC.
  • the homework

Theme 2

📝 About Exams

  • the homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values