AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

George Dekermenjian

MATH113 · MATHMATH · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH261 · CALC1 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want to learn math deeply and can handle uneven experiences and demanding exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear But DemandingTheory HeavyHelpful When AskedGPA RiskMixed Teaching Reviews
  • Most students praise his clarity, helpfulness, and ability to make math understandable.
  • Several reviews warn that calculus and theory-heavy classes can be very hard and grade threatening.
  • Negative reviews focus on poor teaching moments, absences, and feeling dismissed when asking questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A high grade is possible, but students repeatedly say you must dedicate serious time and that the hardest sections can hurt your GPA.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content can be theory heavy, proof based, and especially difficult in calculus.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , though one complaint says the professor was absent several times.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, but the strong negative reviews make him a risky fit.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students warn about GPA risk, proofs on tests, and the need to work hard for a high grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload and study demand appear heavy in calculus and theory-focused sections.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and engaging, but several describe serious teaching failures.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Reviews emphasize tests, practice tests, proofs on tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and clarity, but several warn that his classes can be demanding or poorly taught.

Main concern

The biggest risk is a hard, theory-heavy course that may hurt your GPA.

What students said

“Will probably ruin your GPA.”
MATH261
“But you must dedicate your time to get a high grade.”
MATH261
“NO TEACHING SKILLS!!!!!”
MATH245

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests with proofs and practice tests, but they .

Proofs On TestsPractice TestsDifficult Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, book rules, or .

Proofs On TestsPractice TestsDifficult Exams
“ ”
MATH261
“ so you know what to expect on the test.”
MATH115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to learn math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“I enjoyed this class, not because it was fun but because the and procedures of every problem”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

38/100

“Will probably ruin your GPA.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“ if you want to learn math.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent teacher and very helpful.
  • He takes time out the and is very understanding to life situations.
  • NO TEACHING SKILLS!!!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • His calc 1 course was by far the hardest thing i have ever experienced
  • But you must dedicate your time to get a high grade.
  • Will probably ruin your GPA.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • .
  • so you know what to expect on the test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 detailed but older reviews with a consistent split between strong praise and serious complaints.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2453 reviews
MATH2613 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
CALC11 review
MATH1131 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values