AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charlene Lung

MATH112 · MATH0967 · MATH245 · MATH241 · MATH227 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturerSelf Teaching RequiredDisorganizedTest HeavyAvoid If Possible
  • Most students say .
  • Several reviews say tests do not match reviews or examples well.
  • The course can be passable for self-taught students, but the teaching experience is consistently poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible for strong self-taught students, but and .

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Students say some material and , but her teaching makes easy problems feel harder.

, and there is no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one student felt they still had to attend.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students largely do not recommend her because , and poor preparation for tests.

All and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and homework graded formally, with little sign of leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload does not sound extreme, but and .

Format shift

All workload evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online workload data.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say she is unclear, confusing, disorganized, or ineffective at teaching.

Format shift

All and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews repeatedly describe grades as mainly based on tests and the .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about unclear lectures, disorganization, and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly report that they had to teach themselves because .

What students said

“ . I'm better off teaching myself, and by doing so managed to get an A on the .”
MATH241
“She is extremely hard to understand.”
MATH227
“ .”
MATH245

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because grades appear test-heavy and students report .

Test HeavyConfusing ExamsReviews May Not Match TestsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Test HeavyConfusing ExamsReviews May Not Match TestsFinal Exam
“all !!”
MATH241
“ .”
MATH0967
“ .”
MATH245

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I'm better off teaching myself, and by doing so managed to get an A on the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She is extremely hard to understand.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“if .”

🧪

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Confuses people even further.
  • When she does show an example .
  • She dosen't know how to teach.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • .
  • The day of the .
  • She tries .

Theme 3

📚 About Self Teaching

  • I'm better off teaching myself, and by doing so managed to get an A on the .
  • wouldn't want to ask for help.
  • Worst class I have ever taken and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are eight reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and some are brief.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH2453 reviews
MATH2412 reviews
MATH09671 review
MATH1121 review
MATH2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values