AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jessica Stoudenmire

CAOT0141 · CSIT3036 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Stoudenmire looks promising, but the review evidence is too limited to treat her as a guaranteed easy or standout choice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPositive but Sparse FeedbackModerate DifficultyLimited Evidence
  • The available comments are positive but extremely thin.
  • Difficulty ratings suggest a moderately challenging course experience.
  • There is not enough evidence to judge grading, attendance, workload, or exams confidently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course appears standard to moderately difficult based on difficulty ratings, but comments give no content detail.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility is not clearly proven.

No format-specific attendance .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

The only meaningful comment is positive, but the sample is too sparse for a stronger recommendation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is , so leniency cannot be inferred beyond moderate difficulty ratings.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not mention workload, so a moderate workload is the safest reading.

Format shift

No online workload evidence exists, and in-person evidence is vague.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

The limited comments and high quality ratings suggest a good experience, but evidence is thin.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not describe exams or assignments, so the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but provide almost no concrete detail.

Main concern

The main concern is lack of , and .

What students said

“Awesome Professor.”
CAOT0141
“No Comments”
CSIT3036

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome Professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and evidence limits; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Awesome Professor.”

📉 Evidence Limits

28/100

“No Comments”

👍 Recommendation Signal

72/100

“Awesome Professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome Professor.
  • No Comments

Theme 2

📊 About Evidence Quality

  • No Comments
  • Awesome Professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one has no comment, so conclusions are weak.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CAOT01411 review
CSIT30361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values