AI Rate Professor

English

Salvatore Russo

ENGLC1001 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an easy English credit and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterDismissive communicationVague expectationsHeavy paper loadUnsupportiveBelow college level
  • Students repeatedly call interactions brief, dismissive, and unhelpful.
  • ENGLC1001 often feels too simple for college writing growth despite easy grades.
  • Course 1754 piles on homework and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Two students reported A grades and one called the material overly simple, though 1754 still produced a .

Online reviews show an A with moderate difficulty; in-person ENGLC1001 felt too easy for an A, while 1754 was harder to score well.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

ENGLC1001 is repeatedly described as simple or only moderately hard, but course 1754 is rated very difficult with .

Online difficulty sits around easy-to-moderate; in-person splits between too-easy ENGLC1001 and hard 1754.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Every reviewed section states attendance was mandatory, with no comments suggesting flexibility.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students call the experience disappointing, unsupportive, a waste of time, and urge others to pick anyone else.

Online reviews are disappointed but muted; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Multiple A grades appear even when students felt unsupported or unchallenged, though 1754 still yielded a B-.

Format shift

Online and easy in-person ENGLC1001 look grade-friendly; 1754 is less generous under heavy writing load.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Some call assignments reasonable, but tags and comments also cite lots of homework and so many papers.

Format shift

Online ENGLC1001 sounds lighter; in-person 1754 is paper-heavy.

Teaching experience

Poor

16/100

Students describe vague instruction, dismissive communication, weak support, and little skill growth.

Format shift

; in-person stresses disengagement and wasted time.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments emphasize assignments, homework, and many papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss coursework and papers; exams are not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

one section feels too easy and useless for and .

Main concern

Either no real challenge and little support, or lots of .

What students said

“This class felt below college level. The material was overly simple and didn't challenge students at all.”
ENGLC1001
“ . Just save yourself time and go with literally anyone else.”
1754

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENGLC1001 has reasonable work and interesting material, but vague instruction and .

Main concern

Brief, dismissive communication makes it hard to clarify expectations or get help.

What students said

“I felt that my interactions with the professor were often brief and dismissive.”
ENGLC1001
“I often found the instruction to be vague, which made it difficult for me to understand expectations.”
ENGLC1001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; they focus on papers and overall class quality instead.

Many papers
“Lots of homework, So many papers”
1754

Online

Online reviews do not .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Just save yourself time and go with literally anyone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in person), highlighting weak support, uneven difficulty, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

16/100

“I often found the instruction to be vague, which made it difficult for me to understand expectations and develop new skills.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ . Just save yourself time and go with literally anyone else.”

💬 Support And Communication

20/100

“I felt that my interactions with the professor were often brief and dismissive.”

📝 Workload Risk

42/100

“This class felt below college level. The material was overly simple and didn't challenge students at all so if you're looking to strengthen your writing skills before transferring, you're out of luck.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • interactions with the professor were often brief and dismissive
  • instruction to be vague
  • I didn't feel supported or engaged

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Value

  • felt below college level
  • material was overly simple
  • felt like a waste of time

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendations

  • overall experience was disappointing
  • go with literally anyone else

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent detailed reviews agree on weak support and low quality, but the sample is small and splits across two formats and courses.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGLC10013 reviews
17541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1