AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Jason Kordich

ENG1AH · LIT3 · ENG1 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL1CH · ENG1CH · ENGLISH1C · ENGL1C · ENGC1001 · LIT15 · 145 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
46.73%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want to improve as a writer and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderInconsistent essay feedbackCaring with resubmitsHeavy reading and rewritingPolarizing organization
  • and often inconsistent across drafts, so A-level work takes many rewrites.
  • Many students praise him as caring and willing to help or allow resubmits when you engage him.
  • Online and Canvas organization draw frequent frustration while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with resubmits, but and often need multiple rewrites for full credit.

Online and ; online adds more complaints about incomplete draft feedback.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

, and high expectations make composition and lit sections intellectually demanding.

Both formats emphasize lots of reading and writing; summer and honors sections feel especially dense.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

, though some lighter sections treat it as optional.

In-person comments more often require showing up; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

because he helps writers grow, while the rest warn about attitude, organization, and grading.

Online polarizes more sharply between caring mentor and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

; resubmits help, but new issues often appear late and criteria feel subjective.

Format shift

In-person students note resubmit chances more; online students more often feel stuck with late deductions.

Workload

Heavy

33/100

Expect , and sometimes dense short-term reading loads.

Format shift

Both formats report paper-heavy work; some online sections also .

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Students split between clear, funny, caring lectures and , and poor Canvas use.

Format shift

Stronger praise for accessibility appears in some online and in-person sections; recent in-person ENGC1001 reviews are harsher.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and papers with limited high-stakes exams mentioned in comments.

Format shift

Online and ; occasional quizzes or tests appear but are not the core.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often described as funny and helpful but , and mandatory-feeling attendance in many sections.

Main concern

Inconsistent essay feedback and rubrics.

What students said

“Avoid Professor Jason Kordich. , and ”
ENGC1001
“ ! He's a spunky guy that is passionate about english and makes writing essays and ”
ENG1A
“You will be rewriting the and over again if you want an A”
ENG1CH

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and resubmits, others report unclear prompts, ghosted emails, and boring or .

Main concern

Vague or incomplete draft feedback and after following his notes.

What students said

“Probably one of the specific directions of how to format”
LIT3
“Would literally never take again. There's no opportunities, ”
ENG1A
“When submitting work for review he would not tell you everything you needed to fix”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly multi-draft essays rather than strict proctored exams, with uneven clarity on criteria.

Essay-heavy assessmentMultiple draft feedbackOccasional quizzesResubmit opportunities

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading-heavy prep rather than described closed-book finals.

Essay rewritesParticipation discussionsReading-based classwork
“If an be addressed in the initial round of feedback”
ENGC1001
“He's a but you can always ask for help and resubmit”
LIT3

Online

Online comments , and limited proof of proctoring tools.

Essay draftsRough draft and final submissionsLimited exam detail
“He gives at least 2 changes for each essary to for rough draft and final”
ENG1A
“Allows you to resubmit your work. Beware he has a very specific writing structure he wants you to follow”
LIT3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm gonna be honest and say he's a good professor in a sense where he truly dedicates his time and work for the stuff that we do in class. I will say though this is a tough class and you need a lot of time for it, so if you think you're getting an easy A you better think twice because it's earned not given round here.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📝

34/100

“He grades an . So, and resubmitted, only for him to identify entirely new problems that were NEVER mentioned the first time.”

❤️

70/100

“ and the nicest teacher ever. and didn't give up on me and always made .”

⚖️ Recommendation Split

47/100

“Unless you are an .”

📚 Workload Reality

33/100

“Had a lot of work to do for the 6 weeks I took him. We read 1-3 books/short stories/plays every week on top of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are funny and
  • class content can be since he's very unorganized
  • he lacks patience with certain students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will be rewriting the and over again if you want an A
  • Definitely was not a easy A
  • if you put in effort, you'll get an A

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • online class is a mess.
  • he can't use the LMS at all

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

145

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across years, formats, and courses and mixed personality, supporting strong credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 568
4 out of 518
3 out of 510
2 out of 59
1 out of 540

Course coverage

ENG1A20 reviews
LIT39 reviews
ENGC10014 reviews
ENGL1CH4 reviews
ENG13 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGL1C3 reviews
ENG1AH2 reviews
ENG1CH2 reviews
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH1C1 review
LIT151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 4 · A 15 · A- 4

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1