AI Rate Professor

English

Andreana McCall

ENGL1A · ENGL1C · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an and growth—come ready to participate and keep an open mind.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational discussionsSocial-justice EnglishParticipation heavyLight homeworkAccepts late work
  • Most students call her one of the , and most mind-opening English professors.
  • Class is discussion-based with , and late work accepted.
  • A vocal minority says she focuses on politics over traditional writing skills and grades subjectively.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Submit work, participate, and put honest effort into journals and essays and students say an A is very realistic.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Workload is light and , though discussions push critical thinking on heavy social topics.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and participation drives both grade and classroom energy.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

About 92 percent would take again and the majority describe her as unforgettable, caring, and mind-opening.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Late work is often accepted and effort plus participation usually protects grades, though a .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Many report little homework, only a couple essays, daily journals or in-class work, and lots done during class.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most , and life-changing lectures despite a small cluster of harsh 1-star critiques.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade centers on participation, journals, group work, poems or videos, and a .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Overwhelmingly beloved in-person , and light writing load, with a few sharp critiques about politics and grading.

Main concern

Participation is central, content is heavily social-justice focused, and a few students felt writing skills and .

What students said

“as long as u submit them n participate youll get an A”
ENGL1A
“This is the .”
ENGL1A
“I learned nothing about writing or .”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and projects rather than high-stakes closed-book testing.

Few formal examsEssay-based assessmentJournals and group projectsLate work accepted

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and projects, with little mention of strict timed exams.

EssaysJournalsGroup projectsParticipation-based
“we only had 3 essays over the semester.”
ENGL1A
“ as it's for "suckas", only a couple of essays, which she prepares you for in advance.”
ENGL1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the . She made me want to write and go ocean deep into my thoughts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 in-person reviews, highlighting inspiration, light workload, participation, and political polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is an absolute treasure! She can capture the whole room when talking about a topic.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“ . She values students.”

📝 Easy Workload Path

86/100

“not a lot of hw, as long as u submit them n participate youll get an A”

⚖️ Polarizing Politics

40/100

“Rarely teaches the actual subject & she focuses more on her own political beliefs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never a dull moment in her class
  • awakens minds and makes you think deeper

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Late work turned in by a reasonable time is accepted
  • only a couple of essays

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she genuinely cares for her students
  • Super caring and understanding
  • builds with her students a strong and kind relationship

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six detailed in-person reviews across years show strong majority consensus with a consistent minority dissent pattern.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL1A23 reviews
ENGL1C3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

23 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 5 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1