AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hoang-Quyen Nguyen

MATH71 · MATH51 · MATH181 · MATH110 · MATH180 · MATH140 · MATH130 · MATH50 · 70 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
36.96%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already self-teach math well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkTest-heavy gradePolarizing accentTeach yourself riskOffice hours help if you use them
  • and clear if you grind; many recent calculus students say run.
  • Grade often rides on a while and sometimes ungraded.
  • Accent, fast pace, and rigid methods frustrate .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A usually demands heavy homework grind plus strong timed-exam performance, not light effort.

Both formats emphasize hard work; and Zoom exams.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Especially calculus-level courses feel fast, dense, and .

; some algebra and online hard workers report more manageable content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn that skipping tanks your chance to pass.

Both online and in person commonly require attendance or live participation activities.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and many recent reviews urge students to stay away unless .

Older or lower-level in-person fans exist, but and several online reviews lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; grades hang on a few exams and work must often follow her exact method.

Format shift

; some online and older students call exams fair if you prepare.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and weekly problem volume that overwhelms other STEM courses.

Format shift

; intersession and calc sections get called especially ridiculous.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and students who find lectures confusing, fast, or hard to understand.

Format shift

Online and in person both split; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Three midterms plus final usually dominate while quizzes and .

Format shift

; online adds short timed quizzes and Zoom testing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

lower-level or hardworking students sometimes thrive, while many calc students report , and self-teaching.

Main concern

, and lectures some cannot follow.

What students said

“Be ready to teach yourself as this professor could care less if majority of the class passes or not”
MATH140
“Makes the sheets.”
MATH140
“not an easy A or B, you have to work hard in her class but ”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online experiences range from patient and , and .

Main concern

, and students often feeling lost without self-study.

What students said

“The exams are zoom online. If you're someone who needs more explanation or a .”
MATH140
“Gives an obscene amount of tests and quizzes”
MATH180
“Don't be lazy and you will get an A easily.”
MATH180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and can be nearly impossible to finish on time.

Long hard examsNo cheat sheetsFew graded categoriesZoom online examsTimed tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person grade usually depends on a and a and ungraded homework.

3 tests plus finalNo cheat sheetsLong hard testsHomework often ungraded
“Makes the sheets.”
MATH140
“Class is based around 3 tests and .”
MATH140

Online

and rigid method expectations.

Zoom online examsLittle test timeRigid methodLots of homework
“The .”
MATH140
“gives very little and quizzes”
MATH180

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“PLEASE do yourselves a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (10 online, 40 in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

48/100

“copy her notes exactly, she is very clear on how to do the concepts.”

📚

22/100

“gives a lot of online HW(around 60 problems a week)”

🧪

28/100

“Makes the sheets.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“ !! Started off w a full class, by the last few weeks of school there were only about 6 kids left.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and makes you go over your notes
  • she made the concept easier
  • thick accent, she was trying to let everyone understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be ready to teach yourself
  • Your grade is mostly based on 3 exams and the final
  • not an easy A or B, you have to work hard

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and SUPER NICE
  • extremely rude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

70

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and both formats give a robust, if polarized, picture with recurring workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 58
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH18014 reviews
MATH14010 reviews
MATH717 reviews
MATH1306 reviews
MATH1814 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH514 reviews
MATH503 reviews
MATH1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

4

B 4

C range

9

C 7 · C- 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 2