AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Victor Prutyanov

CHEM80 · CHEM40 · CHEM50 · CHEM51 · PHSCI10 · CHEM81 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
81.13%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will read the textbook and practice daily—he rewards hard work and offers lots of safety-net .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTextbook DependentExtra Credit HeavyTest Heavy ChemBlunt But CaringOrgo Standout
  • Strong chemistry instructor with book.
  • Grades are exam-heavy but and .
  • Personality can feel blunt or sarcastic, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

As are very achievable with textbook practice and EC, but .

Almost ; the two online reviews also report strong A outcomes with effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Organic and general chem concepts plus dense reading make content hard even when teaching is solid.

; online sample is too small to shift the picture.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Most comments say lecture and and are required.

In-person attendance is widely mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

About four in , and despite blunt moments.

; online sample is tiny but positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Plenty of , and fair grading soften tough exams.

Format shift

In-person EC stories dominate; online notes EC and .

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Regular reading, practice problems, labs, and .

Format shift

; online sample does not contradict.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

, and one of the best chem options when you put work in.

Format shift

In-person praise is strong; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Quizzes and ; homework and .

Format shift

; online mentions exams and quizzes similarly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chem and orgo students mostly love his help, EC, and style.

Main concern

; lectures alone are not enough and .

What students said

“One of the . SAC!”
CHEM80
“Prof. Prutyanov is the kindest orgo professor I have ever known.”
CHEM81
“You'll have to teach yourself just about everything from the textbook”
CHEM80

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Sparse online CHEM50 feedback is positive on professionalism, care, and A outcomes with communication.

Main concern

Very small online sample limits confidence beyond pandemic-era CHEM50.

What students said

“he is a very good professor. He is open mind and interesting. You could easily get an A if you care communication and knowledge studying.”
CHEM50
“Professional.”
CHEM50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard but usually fair and and textbook practice rather than trick proctoring.

Textbook-Aligned ExamsTest HeavyImmediate Answer Keys SometimesQuizzes Per ChapterExtra Credit On Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes track taught and textbook material; .

Straightforward But ComprehensiveTextbook Practice Mirrors TestsPop Quizzes PossibleLots Of EC
“ , but they cover everything he teaches, so be sure to practice everything a lot!”
CHEM80
“as soon as you turn in and know your score.”
CHEM81

Online

Online comments do not detail proctoring tools; success is linked to studying and communication rather than open-book claims.

Study DependentCommunication Helps
“You could easily get an A if you care communication and knowledge studying.”
CHEM50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . SAC! He's very approachable inside/outside of class. He helped all of us in his office hours, and stayed a bit longer in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in-person), highlighting exam weight, textbook study, and care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He delivered the material excellently!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ . THE GOAT!”

📖 Textbook Reality

34/100

“IF YOU WANT A GOOD GRADE, YOU HAVE TO READ THE BOOK!!”

🎁 Buffer

68/100

“PLENTY of is given.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very straight to the point
  • he has amazing lectures that will definitely help you understand materials thoroughly
  • Lecture was more like study hall, so

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades are determined mostly by a few tests
  • . However, a good grade is VERY possible if you study well ahead of time.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He had the and was very sweet.
  • he can be pretty rude and blunt and think its funny.
  • Very sweet professor genuinely cares for all his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with 48 in-person and multi-year consistency on textbook dependence, EC, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 513
3 out of 58
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM8027 reviews
CHEM819 reviews
CHEM408 reviews
CHEM504 reviews
CHEM511 review
Show 1 more courses
PHSCI101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 5 · A 15

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3