AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Lucy Jackson

CHILD10 · CHILD50 · CHLD5 · CHLD10 · CHILD1 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if required or no other options; content can be easy but support and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarizing qualityThick accentNitpicky gradingRequired paid course siteBoring lectures
  • Older and some CHILD10 reviews call her an easy A with .
  • Recent CHLD5 and online and .
  • Mandatory paid online access fees and thick .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many report easy A for completing work, but tough docks and .

In-person CHILD10 often easy A; online and CHLD5 show more grading friction.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is introductory child development with straightforward tests and .

Online CHILD50 summer sections feel more packed with discussion boards.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while multiple online reviews list it as .

Online is more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

; praise for easy grades competes with .

Older in-person CHILD10 leans positive; recent CHLD5 and some online lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Some call her an easy grader, but many report docking for , and .

Format shift

Harsh tone stronger online and in CHLD5; older CHILD10 more lenient.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Regular quizzes, observations, discussions, and projects are manageable unless compressed into summer.

Format shift

Online summer CHILD50 jams many discussion boards into eight weeks.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

caring and , and low help for others.

Format shift

In-person split by course; and does-not-care extremes.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of weekly assignments, observations, quizzes/tests, and occasional group projects.

Format shift

Online leans discussion boards and projects; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and syllabus-driven, but lectures can be boring with a thick accent and some harsh CHLD5 feedback.

Main concern

Boring lecture-heavy style, accent comprehension, and nitpicky or .

What students said

“If you just do what she asks you to and listen to her, you'll get an easy A.”
CHILD10
“ .”
CHLD5
“Her lectures are BORING though. Reads DIRECTLY off the book and ”
CHILD50

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Budget First

Online experiences swing from super easy and , and surprise paid website fees.

Main concern

Required , and docks for small submission issues.

What students said

“WARNING. You have to pay $100 within the first week for a website that you use 3 times within the entire course.”
CHILD10
“Doesn't seem to care at all about her students. .”
CHILD10
“Easiest professor I have had, super easy and caring.”
CHILD10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard child-development mix of ; .

Quizzes and testsStudy guidesPowerPoint notesProjects and observations

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture slides posted before exams.

Study guidesPowerPoint notes before testsProjectsPreschool observations
“She and .”
CHILD10
“ . She gives all her lecture slides to the class before the test.”
CHLD10

Online

, and assignments more than proctored exams.

Discussion boardsReading-basedWeekly assignmentsPaid online course access
“Every week there were 3 discussion board post (with responses) and a .”
CHILD50
“ .”
CHILD10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if they are required by my major and if no other professor offers the same course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 mixed CHILD reviews with strong online-offline and era contrasts. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Polarizing Teaching

48/100

“F at teaching.”

💰 Surprise Course Fees

35/100

“You have to pay $100 within the first week for a website that you use 3 times within the entire course.”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

62/100

“Easy A if you do all your work.”

🗣️ Accent and Boredom

45/100

“Her lectures are BORING though. Reads DIRECTLY off the book and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she speaks more than she teaches.
  • She has a thick accent and goes off track.
  • Sticks to the syllabus.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A if you do all your work.
  • .
  • She's an and sticks to the syllabus.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • Her rules are extremely nitpicky and graceless.
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

24 reviews over many years show consistent accent and syllabus themes but sharp course-to-course and era splits lower overall consistency.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHILD1011 reviews
CHLD104 reviews
CHLD54 reviews
CHILD503 reviews
CHILD12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1